A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Seismic Mainshock—Aftershock (MS-AS) Vulnerability Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Exposed to Flood Induced Scour
https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6750-8242
https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8325-4716
https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8435-3919
https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3411-8352
Natural hazards such as earthquakes and floods can affect the safety of bridges negatively. The lateral support loss at the foundation level due to scour (flood-induced) makes the bridges more vulnerable to damages compared to the normal scenario (no scour condition), especially in the event of seismic disturbances. For bridges located at seismically active and flood-prone regions, multi-hazard scenarios of successive occurrence of flood-induced scour and earthquake can yield a better response prediction. Many times the seismic Mainshocks follow several Aftershocks that in turn make the situation even worse, as the secondary shocks may act on the already damaged structure during the Mainshock. The present investigation aims to assess the seismic performance (Mainshock alone and Mainshock—Aftershock sequence) of reinforced concrete bridges that have been inflicted by flood-induced scouring. To quantify the scour depth activity, the regional annual peak flood discharge data with different return period is used. Additionally, the soil-structure interaction is accommodated using suitable spring models as per the accepted recommendations. The selected study bridge is incorporated in a suitable modelling platform considering the scour effect; successively nonlinear dynamic (time history) analyses are performed to estimate the dynamic bridge responses in the absence and presence of flood-induced scour. The structural responses of the bridges are mainly evaluated in terms of displacement ductility (ratio of actual displacement to related yield displacement). Successively seismic fragility curves are developed corresponding to different damage states under both Mainshock and Mainshock—Aftershock events and the results are compared.
Seismic Mainshock—Aftershock (MS-AS) Vulnerability Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Exposed to Flood Induced Scour
https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6750-8242
https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8325-4716
https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8435-3919
https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3411-8352
Natural hazards such as earthquakes and floods can affect the safety of bridges negatively. The lateral support loss at the foundation level due to scour (flood-induced) makes the bridges more vulnerable to damages compared to the normal scenario (no scour condition), especially in the event of seismic disturbances. For bridges located at seismically active and flood-prone regions, multi-hazard scenarios of successive occurrence of flood-induced scour and earthquake can yield a better response prediction. Many times the seismic Mainshocks follow several Aftershocks that in turn make the situation even worse, as the secondary shocks may act on the already damaged structure during the Mainshock. The present investigation aims to assess the seismic performance (Mainshock alone and Mainshock—Aftershock sequence) of reinforced concrete bridges that have been inflicted by flood-induced scouring. To quantify the scour depth activity, the regional annual peak flood discharge data with different return period is used. Additionally, the soil-structure interaction is accommodated using suitable spring models as per the accepted recommendations. The selected study bridge is incorporated in a suitable modelling platform considering the scour effect; successively nonlinear dynamic (time history) analyses are performed to estimate the dynamic bridge responses in the absence and presence of flood-induced scour. The structural responses of the bridges are mainly evaluated in terms of displacement ductility (ratio of actual displacement to related yield displacement). Successively seismic fragility curves are developed corresponding to different damage states under both Mainshock and Mainshock—Aftershock events and the results are compared.
Seismic Mainshock—Aftershock (MS-AS) Vulnerability Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Exposed to Flood Induced Scour
https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6750-8242
https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8325-4716
https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8435-3919
https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3411-8352
Natural hazards such as earthquakes and floods can affect the safety of bridges negatively. The lateral support loss at the foundation level due to scour (flood-induced) makes the bridges more vulnerable to damages compared to the normal scenario (no scour condition), especially in the event of seismic disturbances. For bridges located at seismically active and flood-prone regions, multi-hazard scenarios of successive occurrence of flood-induced scour and earthquake can yield a better response prediction. Many times the seismic Mainshocks follow several Aftershocks that in turn make the situation even worse, as the secondary shocks may act on the already damaged structure during the Mainshock. The present investigation aims to assess the seismic performance (Mainshock alone and Mainshock—Aftershock sequence) of reinforced concrete bridges that have been inflicted by flood-induced scouring. To quantify the scour depth activity, the regional annual peak flood discharge data with different return period is used. Additionally, the soil-structure interaction is accommodated using suitable spring models as per the accepted recommendations. The selected study bridge is incorporated in a suitable modelling platform considering the scour effect; successively nonlinear dynamic (time history) analyses are performed to estimate the dynamic bridge responses in the absence and presence of flood-induced scour. The structural responses of the bridges are mainly evaluated in terms of displacement ductility (ratio of actual displacement to related yield displacement). Successively seismic fragility curves are developed corresponding to different damage states under both Mainshock and Mainshock—Aftershock events and the results are compared.
Seismic Mainshock—Aftershock (MS-AS) Vulnerability Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Exposed to Flood Induced Scour
Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering
Kolathayar, Sreevalsa (editor) / Chian, Siau Chen (editor) / Jithiya, K. K. (author) / Pandikkadavath, Muhamed Safeer (author) / Mangalathu, Sujith (author) / Nagarajan, Praveen (author)
2021-09-21
11 pages
Article/Chapter (Book)
Electronic Resource
English
| Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2022
Vulnerability of case-study reinforced concrete frames to mainshock-aftershock sequences
| TIBKAT | 2019
Seismic vulnerability assessment of RC skew bridges subjected to mainshock-aftershock sequences
| British Library Online Contents | 2018