A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Abstract Two major aspects of the CCF problem are addressed: the nature of CCF in the contexts of data evaluation and reliability analysis, and uncertainties arising from limitations to expert judgment, when failure data are evaluated. Some inconsistencies and pitfalls in contemporary dependent failure modeling methodology are identified, analyzed and discussed quantitatively. Methods and solutions are proposed to avoid inadequate pessimistic evaluations in case of redundancy mismatch.
Abstract Two major aspects of the CCF problem are addressed: the nature of CCF in the contexts of data evaluation and reliability analysis, and uncertainties arising from limitations to expert judgment, when failure data are evaluated. Some inconsistencies and pitfalls in contemporary dependent failure modeling methodology are identified, analyzed and discussed quantitatively. Methods and solutions are proposed to avoid inadequate pessimistic evaluations in case of redundancy mismatch.
Pitfalls in Common Cause Failure Data Evaluation
Dörre, P. (author)
1989-01-01
15 pages
Article/Chapter (Book)
Electronic Resource
English
Parametric Models for Common Cause Failure Analysis
| Springer Verlag | 1989
Estimation of Parameters of Common Cause Failure Models
| Springer Verlag | 1989
Design Defences Against Common Cause/Multiple Related Failure
| Springer Verlag | 1989
Common Pitfalls in Push-Over Analysis
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1998
Some potential pitfalls in failure analysis
| British Library Online Contents | 1995