A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Large-Scale Model Swelling Potential of Expansive Soils in Comparison with Oedometer Swelling Methods
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6459-6320
Samples of natural high, medium and low expansive soils (respectively, designated as Soil-A, Soil-B and Soil-C) were collected from different locations to obtain a wide range of swelling criteria. Soil-B was mixed with 5%, 10%, 15%, 20% and 25% bentonite mineral. The swell potentials of the expansive soil samples were measured using standard test methods for natural deposits and reconstituted samples. The non-homogeneous soil formation in the field and the existing micro- and macrocracks due to drying shrinkage hindered the accurate prediction of the swelling index of the small-scale samples under different stages of field conditions. A large-scale model was established to improve the accuracy and reliability of the test results. The proposed model was designed to estimate the swelling potential of the reconstituted samples under simulated field conditions. The empirical relationships of the multiple regression analysis models were determined on the basis of the best statistical information criteria using STATGRAPHICS Centurion XVII V.17.200. Results supported the prediction of the swelling potential on the basis of the physical properties of soils, thereby alleviating the need to conduct oedometer tests. The proposed relationships and the equations in the literature were compared with the test results of these samples. Overall, the oedometer technique overestimates ground heave by approximately 1.5%, and the proposed relationships are consistent with the measurement results of some researchers but inconsistent with those of others.
Large-Scale Model Swelling Potential of Expansive Soils in Comparison with Oedometer Swelling Methods
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6459-6320
Samples of natural high, medium and low expansive soils (respectively, designated as Soil-A, Soil-B and Soil-C) were collected from different locations to obtain a wide range of swelling criteria. Soil-B was mixed with 5%, 10%, 15%, 20% and 25% bentonite mineral. The swell potentials of the expansive soil samples were measured using standard test methods for natural deposits and reconstituted samples. The non-homogeneous soil formation in the field and the existing micro- and macrocracks due to drying shrinkage hindered the accurate prediction of the swelling index of the small-scale samples under different stages of field conditions. A large-scale model was established to improve the accuracy and reliability of the test results. The proposed model was designed to estimate the swelling potential of the reconstituted samples under simulated field conditions. The empirical relationships of the multiple regression analysis models were determined on the basis of the best statistical information criteria using STATGRAPHICS Centurion XVII V.17.200. Results supported the prediction of the swelling potential on the basis of the physical properties of soils, thereby alleviating the need to conduct oedometer tests. The proposed relationships and the equations in the literature were compared with the test results of these samples. Overall, the oedometer technique overestimates ground heave by approximately 1.5%, and the proposed relationships are consistent with the measurement results of some researchers but inconsistent with those of others.
Large-Scale Model Swelling Potential of Expansive Soils in Comparison with Oedometer Swelling Methods
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6459-6320
Samples of natural high, medium and low expansive soils (respectively, designated as Soil-A, Soil-B and Soil-C) were collected from different locations to obtain a wide range of swelling criteria. Soil-B was mixed with 5%, 10%, 15%, 20% and 25% bentonite mineral. The swell potentials of the expansive soil samples were measured using standard test methods for natural deposits and reconstituted samples. The non-homogeneous soil formation in the field and the existing micro- and macrocracks due to drying shrinkage hindered the accurate prediction of the swelling index of the small-scale samples under different stages of field conditions. A large-scale model was established to improve the accuracy and reliability of the test results. The proposed model was designed to estimate the swelling potential of the reconstituted samples under simulated field conditions. The empirical relationships of the multiple regression analysis models were determined on the basis of the best statistical information criteria using STATGRAPHICS Centurion XVII V.17.200. Results supported the prediction of the swelling potential on the basis of the physical properties of soils, thereby alleviating the need to conduct oedometer tests. The proposed relationships and the equations in the literature were compared with the test results of these samples. Overall, the oedometer technique overestimates ground heave by approximately 1.5%, and the proposed relationships are consistent with the measurement results of some researchers but inconsistent with those of others.
Large-Scale Model Swelling Potential of Expansive Soils in Comparison with Oedometer Swelling Methods
Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng
Mawlood, Yousif Ismael (author) / Hummadi, Rizgar Ali (author)
2020-12-01
11 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Swelling Pressures in Expansive Soils
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1993
A unified swelling potential index for expansive soils
| Online Contents | 2004
A unified swelling potential index for expansive soils
| British Library Online Contents | 2004
Swelling Behavior of Compacted Expansive Soils
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2009
Swelling Behavior of Compacted Expansive Soils
| ASCE | 2009