A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Sustainability science must challenge common sense: a response to Bodin (2021)
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8949-2480
In this comment, we respond to the claim of (Bodin, Sustain Sci 16: 2151–2155, 2021) that sustainability science, as a research community, has begun to “lean to the left” in a problematic manner. On one hand, we remain unconvinced by the examples cited as indications for this tendency, and argue for caution in making such judgements. On the other hand, we hold that that there may be reasons for seemingly “left leaning” positions which are scientific rather than purely political or ideological. Finally, we urge sustainability scientists to take heed of social theorists’ insights regarding the pitfalls of common sense analysis. This can better enable open and reflexive debate on the field’s development as well as the challenges it seeks to address.
Sustainability science must challenge common sense: a response to Bodin (2021)
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8949-2480
In this comment, we respond to the claim of (Bodin, Sustain Sci 16: 2151–2155, 2021) that sustainability science, as a research community, has begun to “lean to the left” in a problematic manner. On one hand, we remain unconvinced by the examples cited as indications for this tendency, and argue for caution in making such judgements. On the other hand, we hold that that there may be reasons for seemingly “left leaning” positions which are scientific rather than purely political or ideological. Finally, we urge sustainability scientists to take heed of social theorists’ insights regarding the pitfalls of common sense analysis. This can better enable open and reflexive debate on the field’s development as well as the challenges it seeks to address.
Sustainability science must challenge common sense: a response to Bodin (2021)
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8949-2480
In this comment, we respond to the claim of (Bodin, Sustain Sci 16: 2151–2155, 2021) that sustainability science, as a research community, has begun to “lean to the left” in a problematic manner. On one hand, we remain unconvinced by the examples cited as indications for this tendency, and argue for caution in making such judgements. On the other hand, we hold that that there may be reasons for seemingly “left leaning” positions which are scientific rather than purely political or ideological. Finally, we urge sustainability scientists to take heed of social theorists’ insights regarding the pitfalls of common sense analysis. This can better enable open and reflexive debate on the field’s development as well as the challenges it seeks to address.
Sustainability science must challenge common sense: a response to Bodin (2021)
Sustain Sci
Isgren, Ellinor (author) / Longo, Stefano B. (author)
Sustainability Science ; 17 ; 2643-2645
2022-11-01
3 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Critical sustainability science , Science/policy interface , Transformation , Objectivity , Social analysis Environment , Environmental Management , Climate Change Management and Policy , Environmental Economics , Landscape Ecology , Sustainable Development , Public Health , Earth and Environmental Science
Disagreeing well in an unparadigmatic field: a response to Bodin (2021)
| Springer Verlag | 2023
Sustainability and Common Sense
| Wiley | 2016
Arkitekturens 30-arskris. Anders Bodin om aldrandets problem
British Library Online Contents | 2011
ANDERS BODIN kommenterar: Nya värden pá Söder
| Online Contents | 1995