A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Prediction of surface roughness of titanium alloy in abrasive waterjet machining process
This work presents a comparison between methods for predicting surface roughness (Ra) of titanium alloy machined by low-pressure abrasive water jet machine developed in our laboratory. Artificial neural network (ANN), support vector machine (SVM) and regression analysis (RA) models were used to analyse the machining data. The work aims at the comparison and selection of the best prediction method based on the accuracy of the predicted surface roughness. An experiment was designed using full factorial experimental design. In the experiment, machining parameters of traverse speed (V), waterjet pressure (P) and standoff distance (h) were considered as model variables. The actual surface roughness values were collected based on the designed experiment. A feed forward back propagation neural network was used, structured as one input layer, one hidden layer with 5 hidden neurons and one output layer. Both ANN and SVM models were trained and analysis of variance was used. F-test was used to validate the RA model. The results showed that the proposed methods indicated an acceptable level of accuracy for predicting the surface roughness, however, ANN model had better accuracy than SVM and RA models as it produced lower relative errors between the predicted values and experimental results.
Prediction of surface roughness of titanium alloy in abrasive waterjet machining process
This work presents a comparison between methods for predicting surface roughness (Ra) of titanium alloy machined by low-pressure abrasive water jet machine developed in our laboratory. Artificial neural network (ANN), support vector machine (SVM) and regression analysis (RA) models were used to analyse the machining data. The work aims at the comparison and selection of the best prediction method based on the accuracy of the predicted surface roughness. An experiment was designed using full factorial experimental design. In the experiment, machining parameters of traverse speed (V), waterjet pressure (P) and standoff distance (h) were considered as model variables. The actual surface roughness values were collected based on the designed experiment. A feed forward back propagation neural network was used, structured as one input layer, one hidden layer with 5 hidden neurons and one output layer. Both ANN and SVM models were trained and analysis of variance was used. F-test was used to validate the RA model. The results showed that the proposed methods indicated an acceptable level of accuracy for predicting the surface roughness, however, ANN model had better accuracy than SVM and RA models as it produced lower relative errors between the predicted values and experimental results.
Prediction of surface roughness of titanium alloy in abrasive waterjet machining process
Int J Interact Des Manuf
Ting, Ho Yi (author) / Asmelash, Mebrahitom (author) / Azhari, Azmir (author) / Alemu, Tamiru (author) / Saptaji, Kushendarsyah (author)
2022-03-01
9 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Abrasive waterjet machining , Artificial neural network , Regression analysis , Support vector machine , Surface roughness , Titanium alloy Engineering , Engineering, general , Engineering Design , Mechanical Engineering , Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD, CAE) and Design , Electronics and Microelectronics, Instrumentation , Industrial Design
British Library Online Contents | 2017
|Study on Surface Roughness and Fatigue Property of Abrasive Waterjet Peened Aluminum Alloy
Springer Verlag | 2024
|Analysis of abrasive waterjet factors influencing the cast aluminium surface roughness
British Library Online Contents | 2007
|