A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Ownership and inequalities: exploring UNEP’s Environmental Cooperation for Peacebuilding Program
The question of ownership—that is, who is included and excluded from policy processes—has become one of the most pressing issues in the global discourse on peace and conflict. While research shows that the inclusion of domestic actors is critical to success, broader international processes often neglect these actors. Focused on environmental peacebuilding—the sustainable management of natural resources in post-conflict settings—as an emerging area, this article employs qualitative content analysis (QCA) to study four core reports of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)’s Environmental Cooperation for Peacebuilding Programme (2008–2015). The results reveal that the framing of environmental peacebuilding in these documents contributes to power inequalities being reinforced. The reports’ language suggests that, overall, UNEP favors international ownership of environmental peacebuilding. By contrast, local actors—both state and non-state—appear to be considered a risk in the context of natural resource management. This article discusses the implications of this lack of inclusion for peacebuilding practice.
Ownership and inequalities: exploring UNEP’s Environmental Cooperation for Peacebuilding Program
The question of ownership—that is, who is included and excluded from policy processes—has become one of the most pressing issues in the global discourse on peace and conflict. While research shows that the inclusion of domestic actors is critical to success, broader international processes often neglect these actors. Focused on environmental peacebuilding—the sustainable management of natural resources in post-conflict settings—as an emerging area, this article employs qualitative content analysis (QCA) to study four core reports of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)’s Environmental Cooperation for Peacebuilding Programme (2008–2015). The results reveal that the framing of environmental peacebuilding in these documents contributes to power inequalities being reinforced. The reports’ language suggests that, overall, UNEP favors international ownership of environmental peacebuilding. By contrast, local actors—both state and non-state—appear to be considered a risk in the context of natural resource management. This article discusses the implications of this lack of inclusion for peacebuilding practice.
Ownership and inequalities: exploring UNEP’s Environmental Cooperation for Peacebuilding Program
Sustain Sci
Krampe, Florian (author)
Sustainability Science ; 16 ; 1159-1172
2021-07-01
14 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
United Nations Environment Programme , Ownership , Environmental peacebuilding , Qualitative content analysis Environment , Environmental Management , Climate Change Management and Policy , Environmental Economics , Landscape Ecology , Sustainable Development , Public Health , Earth and Environmental Science
UNEP's strategy on land use management
Catalogue agriculture | 2004
|Awareness and preparedness for emergencies at local level - UNEP's APPELL programme
Online Contents | 1998
|India–Pakistan River Water Sharing: Prospects for Environmental Peacebuilding
Springer Verlag | 2020
|Water and post-conflict peacebuilding: introduction
Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2011
|Water and post-conflict peacebuilding: introduction
Online Contents | 2011
|