A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Ductility Classes in prEN 1998–1. Comparative Analysis on Moment Resisting Frames
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8863-4427
In case of severe earthquakes, a ductile behaviour of the structure is the best option to choose. The post-elastic behaviour ability of a structure is generally managed in seismic design codes by means of the ductility class of the structure. The process of revising the Eurocodes is underway. The future version of the European standard prEN 1998–1-1 defines three such classes, DC1, DC2 and DC3, with different meanings than the existing DCL, DCM and DCH in the current version of EN 1998–1. A question that arises is whether a less elaborated structural analysis and design, involved by DC1 or even DC2 structures could finally lead to a more cost-effective solution than a DC3 structure, which requires more sophisticated analyses and more careful design. Several answers can be obtained for each type of structural system. Under these circumstances, numerical testing of the new requirements is always useful. This paper focuses on the differences that can be highlighted in the design of moment-resisting frames according to the three new approaches. A four-storey moment-resisting structure was analysed to test the results for the three possible approaches. Three solutions were obtained using the requirements defined for DC1, DC2 and DC3. All three structures were designed based on resistance requirements. The material consumption and the post-elastic behaviour were observed for each one of the three structural solutions.
Ductility Classes in prEN 1998–1. Comparative Analysis on Moment Resisting Frames
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8863-4427
In case of severe earthquakes, a ductile behaviour of the structure is the best option to choose. The post-elastic behaviour ability of a structure is generally managed in seismic design codes by means of the ductility class of the structure. The process of revising the Eurocodes is underway. The future version of the European standard prEN 1998–1-1 defines three such classes, DC1, DC2 and DC3, with different meanings than the existing DCL, DCM and DCH in the current version of EN 1998–1. A question that arises is whether a less elaborated structural analysis and design, involved by DC1 or even DC2 structures could finally lead to a more cost-effective solution than a DC3 structure, which requires more sophisticated analyses and more careful design. Several answers can be obtained for each type of structural system. Under these circumstances, numerical testing of the new requirements is always useful. This paper focuses on the differences that can be highlighted in the design of moment-resisting frames according to the three new approaches. A four-storey moment-resisting structure was analysed to test the results for the three possible approaches. Three solutions were obtained using the requirements defined for DC1, DC2 and DC3. All three structures were designed based on resistance requirements. The material consumption and the post-elastic behaviour were observed for each one of the three structural solutions.
Ductility Classes in prEN 1998–1. Comparative Analysis on Moment Resisting Frames
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8863-4427
In case of severe earthquakes, a ductile behaviour of the structure is the best option to choose. The post-elastic behaviour ability of a structure is generally managed in seismic design codes by means of the ductility class of the structure. The process of revising the Eurocodes is underway. The future version of the European standard prEN 1998–1-1 defines three such classes, DC1, DC2 and DC3, with different meanings than the existing DCL, DCM and DCH in the current version of EN 1998–1. A question that arises is whether a less elaborated structural analysis and design, involved by DC1 or even DC2 structures could finally lead to a more cost-effective solution than a DC3 structure, which requires more sophisticated analyses and more careful design. Several answers can be obtained for each type of structural system. Under these circumstances, numerical testing of the new requirements is always useful. This paper focuses on the differences that can be highlighted in the design of moment-resisting frames according to the three new approaches. A four-storey moment-resisting structure was analysed to test the results for the three possible approaches. Three solutions were obtained using the requirements defined for DC1, DC2 and DC3. All three structures were designed based on resistance requirements. The material consumption and the post-elastic behaviour were observed for each one of the three structural solutions.
Ductility Classes in prEN 1998–1. Comparative Analysis on Moment Resisting Frames
Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering
Mazzolani, Federico M. (editor) / Piluso, Vincenzo (editor) / Nastri, Elide (editor) / Formisano, Antonio (editor) / Ștefănescu, Bogdan Cătălin (author)
International Conference on the Behaviour of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas ; 2024 ; Salerno, Italy
2024-06-24
11 pages
Article/Chapter (Book)
Electronic Resource
English
Ductility Classes in prEN 1998-1. Comparative Analysis on Eccentrically Braced Frames
| Springer Verlag | 2022
Plastic Design of Moment Resisting Frames with Low Ductility
| Springer Verlag | 2024
Evaluation of Ductility and Ductility Reduction Factor for Moment Resisting Steel Frames
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2002