A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Science in Indigenous homelands: addressing power and justice in sustainability science from/with/in the Penobscot River
https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2477-2609
https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8214-8233
https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2831-0321
https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9754-4079
https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0405-1636
Sustainability science offers an alternative space for research that challenges colonial histories of western science, especially in its orientation to interdisciplinarity and for addressing complex problems through equitable knowledge co-production processes. However, the justice-oriented commitments within sustainability science remain underdeveloped, in particular for centering indigenous research methods (IRM) and promoting decolonization of academic institutions. In this paper, we draw from more than 10 years of experience across three cases of conducting sustainability science in Indigenous homelands. The cases focus on (1) adaptive responses to the Emerald Ash Borer insect which threatens black ash basketmaking cultures and economies; (2) efforts to link science with decision making to protect public health and reduce shellfish bed closures; and (3) collaborative research to support dam removal and river restoration. We identify tensions in science as a discourse, including how sustainability science is uniquely shaped by practices of naming and social constructions of time. We then describe how we engage these tensions through four main commitments to critical praxis, or tailored practices that respond to emergent problems and systems of power. These commitments include centering Wabanaki diplomacy and IRMs, redesigning all stages of research for inclusivity and dialogue, attending to multiple temporalities, and supporting Wabanaki and Indigenous students as leaders and researchers. To conclude, we reflect on how these practices may be adapted to other contexts, histories, and sustainability-related issues.
Science in Indigenous homelands: addressing power and justice in sustainability science from/with/in the Penobscot River
https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2477-2609
https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8214-8233
https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2831-0321
https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9754-4079
https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0405-1636
Sustainability science offers an alternative space for research that challenges colonial histories of western science, especially in its orientation to interdisciplinarity and for addressing complex problems through equitable knowledge co-production processes. However, the justice-oriented commitments within sustainability science remain underdeveloped, in particular for centering indigenous research methods (IRM) and promoting decolonization of academic institutions. In this paper, we draw from more than 10 years of experience across three cases of conducting sustainability science in Indigenous homelands. The cases focus on (1) adaptive responses to the Emerald Ash Borer insect which threatens black ash basketmaking cultures and economies; (2) efforts to link science with decision making to protect public health and reduce shellfish bed closures; and (3) collaborative research to support dam removal and river restoration. We identify tensions in science as a discourse, including how sustainability science is uniquely shaped by practices of naming and social constructions of time. We then describe how we engage these tensions through four main commitments to critical praxis, or tailored practices that respond to emergent problems and systems of power. These commitments include centering Wabanaki diplomacy and IRMs, redesigning all stages of research for inclusivity and dialogue, attending to multiple temporalities, and supporting Wabanaki and Indigenous students as leaders and researchers. To conclude, we reflect on how these practices may be adapted to other contexts, histories, and sustainability-related issues.
Science in Indigenous homelands: addressing power and justice in sustainability science from/with/in the Penobscot River
https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2477-2609
https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8214-8233
https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2831-0321
https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9754-4079
https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0405-1636
Sustainability science offers an alternative space for research that challenges colonial histories of western science, especially in its orientation to interdisciplinarity and for addressing complex problems through equitable knowledge co-production processes. However, the justice-oriented commitments within sustainability science remain underdeveloped, in particular for centering indigenous research methods (IRM) and promoting decolonization of academic institutions. In this paper, we draw from more than 10 years of experience across three cases of conducting sustainability science in Indigenous homelands. The cases focus on (1) adaptive responses to the Emerald Ash Borer insect which threatens black ash basketmaking cultures and economies; (2) efforts to link science with decision making to protect public health and reduce shellfish bed closures; and (3) collaborative research to support dam removal and river restoration. We identify tensions in science as a discourse, including how sustainability science is uniquely shaped by practices of naming and social constructions of time. We then describe how we engage these tensions through four main commitments to critical praxis, or tailored practices that respond to emergent problems and systems of power. These commitments include centering Wabanaki diplomacy and IRMs, redesigning all stages of research for inclusivity and dialogue, attending to multiple temporalities, and supporting Wabanaki and Indigenous students as leaders and researchers. To conclude, we reflect on how these practices may be adapted to other contexts, histories, and sustainability-related issues.
Science in Indigenous homelands: addressing power and justice in sustainability science from/with/in the Penobscot River
Sustain Sci
McGreavy, Bridie (author) / Ranco, Darren (author) / Daigle, John (author) / Greenlaw, Suzanne (author) / Altvater, Nolan (author) / Quiring, Tyler (author) / Michelle, Natalie (author) / Paul, Jan (author) / Binette, Maliyan (author) / Benson, Brawley (author)
Sustainability Science ; 16 ; 937-947
2021-05-01
11 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Indigenous research methods , Sustainability science , Discourse , Rhetoric , Time , Critical praxis Environment , Environmental Management , Climate Change Management and Policy , Environmental Economics , Landscape Ecology , Sustainable Development , Public Health , Earth and Environmental Science
Weaving Indigenous science, protocols and sustainability science
| Springer Verlag | 2015
Water resources of the Penobscot River basin, Maine
| TIBKAT | 1912
Water resources of the Penobscot River basin, Maine
| UB Braunschweig | 1912
Enhancing the sustainability science agenda through Indigenous methodology
| Springer Verlag | 2022