A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Where the Waters Divide: First Nations, Tainted Water and Environmental Justice in Canada
We have survived Canada's assault on our identity and our rights … Our survival is a testament to our determination and will to survive as a people. We are prepared to participate in Canada's future—but only on the terms that we believe to be our rightful heritage.
Wallace Labillois, Council of Elders, Kingsclear, New BrunswickThis paper argues for a strengthening of the theoretical relationship between neo-liberalism and environmental justice. Empirical research involving First Nations communities in southwestern Ontario suggests that neo-liberal reforms introduced in the mid-1990s were particularly discriminatory against Canada's indigenous peoples, serving to exacerbate historical disparities in health, environment pollution, and well-being. In particular, under neo-liberal reform in Ontario, recognition of environmental injustices has become much more difficult for First Nations communities. Furthermore, this ‘new’ form of environmental governance has broadly reduced legitimate opportunities for First Nations to participate in environmental governance that affects their health and welfare. In short, this research supports a widening of the definition of environmental justice advocated by David Schlosberg and others (Environmental Politics, 13(3) (2004), pp. 517–540; Agyeman, Bullard and Evans 2003; Akwesasne Task Force on the Environment, Research Advisory committee 1997; Di Chiro 1998) if we are to understand the subtle, complex and multiple ways that this new form of environmental governance is particularly harmful to marginalized groups, such as First Nations in Canada.
Where the Waters Divide: First Nations, Tainted Water and Environmental Justice in Canada
We have survived Canada's assault on our identity and our rights … Our survival is a testament to our determination and will to survive as a people. We are prepared to participate in Canada's future—but only on the terms that we believe to be our rightful heritage.
Wallace Labillois, Council of Elders, Kingsclear, New BrunswickThis paper argues for a strengthening of the theoretical relationship between neo-liberalism and environmental justice. Empirical research involving First Nations communities in southwestern Ontario suggests that neo-liberal reforms introduced in the mid-1990s were particularly discriminatory against Canada's indigenous peoples, serving to exacerbate historical disparities in health, environment pollution, and well-being. In particular, under neo-liberal reform in Ontario, recognition of environmental injustices has become much more difficult for First Nations communities. Furthermore, this ‘new’ form of environmental governance has broadly reduced legitimate opportunities for First Nations to participate in environmental governance that affects their health and welfare. In short, this research supports a widening of the definition of environmental justice advocated by David Schlosberg and others (Environmental Politics, 13(3) (2004), pp. 517–540; Agyeman, Bullard and Evans 2003; Akwesasne Task Force on the Environment, Research Advisory committee 1997; Di Chiro 1998) if we are to understand the subtle, complex and multiple ways that this new form of environmental governance is particularly harmful to marginalized groups, such as First Nations in Canada.
Where the Waters Divide: First Nations, Tainted Water and Environmental Justice in Canada
Mascarenhas, Michael (author)
Local Environment ; 12 ; 565-577
2007-12-01
13 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
| British Library Online Contents | 1992
| Online Contents | 1994
Corrosion Caused Lead-Tainted Water in Flint, Michigan
| British Library Online Contents | 2016
Environmental Justice in Canada
| Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2007
Reviews - The tainted desert: Environmental and social ruin in the American West
| Online Contents | 1999