A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Discourses of accountability: Policy scrutiny of an English regional development agency
Blackman T. and Ormston C. (2005) Discourses of accountability: policy scrutiny of an English regional development agency, Regional Studies 39 , 375–386. England's regional development agencies (RDAs) are publicly funded economic development bodies accountable to both central government and representative regional chambers. The relationship of accountability to chambers has recently been strengthened by giving them responsibility for the formal scrutiny of RDAs' work. This paper examines how accountability was interpreted by key professional actors in the first set of scrutiny exercises in North East England. Contrasting repertoires of accountability were found to be in play, reflecting the different relationships of power of the two organizations. Although these shaped the extent to which different types of evidence were regarded as legitimate in judging the effectiveness of the RDA, a dominant and shared discourse of consensus was constructed by the two groups of officers, reflecting their concerns that regionally based decision‐making continues to be given legitimacy by England's strong central state.
Discourses of accountability: Policy scrutiny of an English regional development agency
Blackman T. and Ormston C. (2005) Discourses of accountability: policy scrutiny of an English regional development agency, Regional Studies 39 , 375–386. England's regional development agencies (RDAs) are publicly funded economic development bodies accountable to both central government and representative regional chambers. The relationship of accountability to chambers has recently been strengthened by giving them responsibility for the formal scrutiny of RDAs' work. This paper examines how accountability was interpreted by key professional actors in the first set of scrutiny exercises in North East England. Contrasting repertoires of accountability were found to be in play, reflecting the different relationships of power of the two organizations. Although these shaped the extent to which different types of evidence were regarded as legitimate in judging the effectiveness of the RDA, a dominant and shared discourse of consensus was constructed by the two groups of officers, reflecting their concerns that regionally based decision‐making continues to be given legitimacy by England's strong central state.
Discourses of accountability: Policy scrutiny of an English regional development agency
Blackman, Tim (author) / Ormston, Christianne (author)
Regional Studies ; 39 ; 375-386
2005-05-01
12 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Discourses of accountability: Policy scrutiny of an English regional development agency
| Online Contents | 2005
Plugging the accountability gap? Evaluating the effectiveness of regional scrutiny
| Online Contents | 2007
Regional Development Agencies and English regionalisation: The question of accountability
| Online Contents | 1999
Fiscal devolution and the accountability gap: budget scrutiny following tax devolution to Scotland
| Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2023