A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
The urban density in two Nordic capitals – comparing the development of Oslo and Helsinki metropolitan regions
Situated in northern Europe, the capital regions of Helsinki, and Oslo have many similar premises concerning urban development. However, the structure of the two regions differs by many measures. We explore the differences in urban density and its development in the both regions and the policy instruments that have affected them. Differences are identified by comparing the population densities of urban settlements and the mean distances from residents and workplaces to the city centres of Oslo and Helsinki using GIS methodology and existing literature. In the Oslo region, the population density shifted from a decreasing trend to an increasing one in the late 1980s. In contrast, the Helsinki region only started to densify in the 2010s. Also, the mean distance of residents and workplaces from the city centre is farther in Helsinki. The long period of low-density housing development and the creation of jobs outside centres in Helsinki is related to weaker political steering towards a compact urban form. In Oslo, regulations such as a greenbelt policy but also physical factors, led to densification relatively early. Lagging in densification policies, Helsinki could learn from the experiences of steering land use and mobility in Oslo, which would need additional research.
The urban density in two Nordic capitals – comparing the development of Oslo and Helsinki metropolitan regions
Situated in northern Europe, the capital regions of Helsinki, and Oslo have many similar premises concerning urban development. However, the structure of the two regions differs by many measures. We explore the differences in urban density and its development in the both regions and the policy instruments that have affected them. Differences are identified by comparing the population densities of urban settlements and the mean distances from residents and workplaces to the city centres of Oslo and Helsinki using GIS methodology and existing literature. In the Oslo region, the population density shifted from a decreasing trend to an increasing one in the late 1980s. In contrast, the Helsinki region only started to densify in the 2010s. Also, the mean distance of residents and workplaces from the city centre is farther in Helsinki. The long period of low-density housing development and the creation of jobs outside centres in Helsinki is related to weaker political steering towards a compact urban form. In Oslo, regulations such as a greenbelt policy but also physical factors, led to densification relatively early. Lagging in densification policies, Helsinki could learn from the experiences of steering land use and mobility in Oslo, which would need additional research.
The urban density in two Nordic capitals – comparing the development of Oslo and Helsinki metropolitan regions
Tiitu, Maija (author) / Naess, Petter (author) / Ristimäki, Mika (author)
European Planning Studies ; 29 ; 1092-1112
2021-06-03
21 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Conceptualizing ‘green’ in urban and regional planning – the cases of Oslo and Helsinki
| Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2024
Greenhouse Gas Implications of Urban Sprawl in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area
| DOAJ | 2013