A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Comparative thermal comfort study in educational buildings in autumn and winter seasons
Maintaining thermal comfort throughout an entire year is complicated because conditions vary greatly throughout the seasons. The aim of this article was to understand the influence of seasonal characteristics on the thermal comfort in classrooms and to propose a method to select suitable adaptive coefficients for different conditions. Field investigations were conducted in an educational building in Tianjin during autumn and winter. In the study, multiple environmental parameters were investigated, including air temperature, black globe temperature, relative humidity, air velocity, and the vertical temperature difference (VTD). The respondents’ thermal sensations were collected via questionnaires. The respondents’ thermal sensation and the influence of seasonal characteristics on thermal sensation were analyzed. The results showed that the thermal neutral temperature varied in different seasons, and the deviations between the mean thermal sensation vote (MTSV) and the predicted mean vote (PMV) showed obvious discrepancies throughout the different seasons. Furthermore, the adaptive coefficient αs for the adaptive thermal comfort prediction model (APMV) were 0.25 and 0.57 for autumn and winter, respectively. Based on the aforementioned result, a discriminant function (DFA) using the seasonal factors to select the suitable α was obtained.
Comparative thermal comfort study in educational buildings in autumn and winter seasons
Maintaining thermal comfort throughout an entire year is complicated because conditions vary greatly throughout the seasons. The aim of this article was to understand the influence of seasonal characteristics on the thermal comfort in classrooms and to propose a method to select suitable adaptive coefficients for different conditions. Field investigations were conducted in an educational building in Tianjin during autumn and winter. In the study, multiple environmental parameters were investigated, including air temperature, black globe temperature, relative humidity, air velocity, and the vertical temperature difference (VTD). The respondents’ thermal sensations were collected via questionnaires. The respondents’ thermal sensation and the influence of seasonal characteristics on thermal sensation were analyzed. The results showed that the thermal neutral temperature varied in different seasons, and the deviations between the mean thermal sensation vote (MTSV) and the predicted mean vote (PMV) showed obvious discrepancies throughout the different seasons. Furthermore, the adaptive coefficient αs for the adaptive thermal comfort prediction model (APMV) were 0.25 and 0.57 for autumn and winter, respectively. Based on the aforementioned result, a discriminant function (DFA) using the seasonal factors to select the suitable α was obtained.
Comparative thermal comfort study in educational buildings in autumn and winter seasons
Liu, Gang (author) / Jia, Yihong (author) / Cen, Chao (author) / Ma, Binglu (author) / Liu, Kuixing (author)
Science and Technology for the Built Environment ; 26 ; 185-194
2020-02-07
10 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Spot Monitoring: Thermal comfort evaluation in 25 office buildings in winter
Online Contents | 2009
|Spot Monitoring: Thermal comfort evaluation in 25 office buildings in winter
Online Contents | 2009
|Spot Monitoring: Thermal comfort evaluation in 25 office buildings in winter
British Library Online Contents | 2009
|