A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
On garden-city lines: looking into social housing estates of interwar Europe
After the Great War, numerous housing estates on garden-city lines were created in Continental Europe under the command of state or local authorities, who took over from enlightened entrepreneurial initiatives or co-operative movements of the previous years. Admittedly, the cases of Paris, Brussels, Frankfurt and Berlin express in the most complete form the synthesis of garden-city ideas and techniques into foreign planning practices. Based on published sources, this article places the schemes in their national context, and explores the planning tools for their realization, as they were formed by state traditions. Parisian garden cities were accomplished in a centralist mode by first-rate officials and professionals, as befits a country with the administrative eminence of France. In Belgium, under a similar framework, the quality of the outcome came out of direct contact between local people's cooperatives and their architects, who were engaged in social and environmental reform. The German approach was marked by the pioneering initiatives of municipalities, historically empowered for more independent decision-making. In diverse national and local backgrounds, the garden-city thought showed remarkable tenacity: variations of the Howardian ideas about land ownership persisted, ingenious financial mechanisms were efficiently set up, and community spirit was often able to survive the official mode of home allocation. Finally, commitment to social, economic, and technical advancement brought many of the estates in discussion to the leading edge of the architectural production in Europe.
On garden-city lines: looking into social housing estates of interwar Europe
After the Great War, numerous housing estates on garden-city lines were created in Continental Europe under the command of state or local authorities, who took over from enlightened entrepreneurial initiatives or co-operative movements of the previous years. Admittedly, the cases of Paris, Brussels, Frankfurt and Berlin express in the most complete form the synthesis of garden-city ideas and techniques into foreign planning practices. Based on published sources, this article places the schemes in their national context, and explores the planning tools for their realization, as they were formed by state traditions. Parisian garden cities were accomplished in a centralist mode by first-rate officials and professionals, as befits a country with the administrative eminence of France. In Belgium, under a similar framework, the quality of the outcome came out of direct contact between local people's cooperatives and their architects, who were engaged in social and environmental reform. The German approach was marked by the pioneering initiatives of municipalities, historically empowered for more independent decision-making. In diverse national and local backgrounds, the garden-city thought showed remarkable tenacity: variations of the Howardian ideas about land ownership persisted, ingenious financial mechanisms were efficiently set up, and community spirit was often able to survive the official mode of home allocation. Finally, commitment to social, economic, and technical advancement brought many of the estates in discussion to the leading edge of the architectural production in Europe.
On garden-city lines: looking into social housing estates of interwar Europe
Kafkoula, Kiki (author)
Planning Perspectives ; 28 ; 171-198
2013-04-01
28 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
On garden-city lines: looking into social housing estates of interwar Europe
| Online Contents | 2013
On garden-city lines: looking into social housing estates of interwar Europe
Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2013
Restructuring large housing estates in Europe
| TIBKAT | 2005