A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Mobility and urban quality of life: a comparison of the hedonic pricing and subjective well-being methods
There is no consensus about the relation between urban scale and quality of life. Quality of life in Oslo and the rest of Norway is compared using two commonly employed methods to measure geographical variation in quality of life: hedonic pricing based on the Rosen–Roback model and analysis of subjective well-being. Since the hedonic pricing approach assumes that households are perfectly mobile, the population is divided into mobility quartiles. The methods arrive at the same conclusion for the most mobile population group – quality of life is higher in Oslo – but different conclusions are reached for other mobility groups.
Mobility and urban quality of life: a comparison of the hedonic pricing and subjective well-being methods
There is no consensus about the relation between urban scale and quality of life. Quality of life in Oslo and the rest of Norway is compared using two commonly employed methods to measure geographical variation in quality of life: hedonic pricing based on the Rosen–Roback model and analysis of subjective well-being. Since the hedonic pricing approach assumes that households are perfectly mobile, the population is divided into mobility quartiles. The methods arrive at the same conclusion for the most mobile population group – quality of life is higher in Oslo – but different conclusions are reached for other mobility groups.
Mobility and urban quality of life: a comparison of the hedonic pricing and subjective well-being methods
Carlsen, Fredrik (author) / Leknes, Stefan (author)
Regional Studies ; 55 ; 245-255
2021-02-01
11 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
quality of life , cities , mobility , hedonic pricing , place satisfaction , I31 , J17 , R23
The Association Between Urban Environments and Hedonic Well-Being
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2022
Compact city, urban sprawl, and subjective well-being
Elsevier | 2019
|