A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
The “Right to the City” is, for better or worse, a catchy phrase, and has been used with quite a diversity of often contradictory meanings. The article describes Lefebvre's own reading, a strategic reading, a discontented reading, a spatial reading, a collaborationist reading, and a subversive reading. It concludes with the suggestion of an alternate reading, a sectoral reading, consistent with the experience of the Occupy movement today. One should be careful which reading one uses.
The “Right to the City” is, for better or worse, a catchy phrase, and has been used with quite a diversity of often contradictory meanings. The article describes Lefebvre's own reading, a strategic reading, a discontented reading, a spatial reading, a collaborationist reading, and a subversive reading. It concludes with the suggestion of an alternate reading, a sectoral reading, consistent with the experience of the Occupy movement today. One should be careful which reading one uses.
Reading the Right to the City
Marcuse, Peter (author)
City ; 18 ; 4-9
2014-01-02
6 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
| Online Contents | 2014
Reading the right to the city. Part two: Organisational realities
| Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2014
Reading the right to the city. Part two: Organisational realities
| Online Contents | 2014
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1995
EndCommercial: Reading the City
British Library Online Contents | 2003