A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
The Use of Local Sustainability Indicators: case studies in two Swedish municipalities1
This article contributes to the debate on the role of local sustainability indicators in ongoing democratisation efforts. We examine the extent to which five different systems of local sustainability indicators within two Swedish municipalities—Stockholm and Sundsvall—are either expert or citizen oriented, and relate these findings to the indicator systems' profile, function and political/ administrative context. Even though three of the indicator systems can be classified as citizen oriented, there are few signs of true engagement and dialogue with the citizens over a longer period of time. The remaining two indicator systems are expert oriented with an environmental focus. Hence, we conclude that the systems in use are largely symbolic responses to the demands for democracy within the agenda for sustainable development albeit attempts to include environmental, economic, social and democratic perspectives of sustainability. Despite the fact that Stockholm and Sundsvall show differences in governing styles in their approaches to sustainability indicators it seems difficult for both municipalities to put sustainable development into practice in terms of citizen participation.
The Use of Local Sustainability Indicators: case studies in two Swedish municipalities1
This article contributes to the debate on the role of local sustainability indicators in ongoing democratisation efforts. We examine the extent to which five different systems of local sustainability indicators within two Swedish municipalities—Stockholm and Sundsvall—are either expert or citizen oriented, and relate these findings to the indicator systems' profile, function and political/ administrative context. Even though three of the indicator systems can be classified as citizen oriented, there are few signs of true engagement and dialogue with the citizens over a longer period of time. The remaining two indicator systems are expert oriented with an environmental focus. Hence, we conclude that the systems in use are largely symbolic responses to the demands for democracy within the agenda for sustainable development albeit attempts to include environmental, economic, social and democratic perspectives of sustainability. Despite the fact that Stockholm and Sundsvall show differences in governing styles in their approaches to sustainability indicators it seems difficult for both municipalities to put sustainable development into practice in terms of citizen participation.
The Use of Local Sustainability Indicators: case studies in two Swedish municipalities1
ECKERBERG, KATERINA (author) / MINEUR, EVA (author)
Local Environment ; 8 ; 591-614
2003-12-01
24 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Local Sustainability Indicators
Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2003
|Indicators of local sustainability: The LGMB's Sustainability Indicators Research Project
British Library Online Contents | 1995
|Re-thinking sustainability indicators: local perspectives of urban sustainability
British Library Online Contents | 2013
|Re-thinking sustainability indicators: local perspectives of urban sustainability
BASE | 2013
|Towards sustainability management systems in three Swedish local authorities
Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2009
|