A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Laboratory performance of new and used residential HVAC filters: Comparison to field results (RP-1649)
Particle filters are used in heating, ventilating, and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems to protect equipment and reduce exposure to airborne particles. Filtration standards such as ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 52.2 are used to evaluate filter performance in a laboratory setting. In this work, we examined the lab-tested performance of new filters with different nominal efficiencies as determined by ASHRAE Standard 52.2 and compared these results to the lab-tested and in-situ performance of filters deployed in 21 occupied residential environments. The lab-tested results comparison shows that the dust loading and conditioning procedure in ASHRAE Standard 52.2 provides a reasonable range of efficiencies for the used filters, but the target final pressure drop of 250 Pa is an overestimation of the realistic pressure drops. Moreover, the specified test dust was not a good representation of the dust in this sample of residential environments. The lab-tested and in-situ results comparison suggests that even for the same filter, its lab-tested performance could differ greatly from its in-situ performance because of variations in system and loading conditions, which are not captured in the laboratory setting. Overall, the lab-tested results are an overestimation of the in-situ efficiency and an underestimation of the in-situ pressure drop for both new and used filters.
Laboratory performance of new and used residential HVAC filters: Comparison to field results (RP-1649)
Particle filters are used in heating, ventilating, and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems to protect equipment and reduce exposure to airborne particles. Filtration standards such as ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 52.2 are used to evaluate filter performance in a laboratory setting. In this work, we examined the lab-tested performance of new filters with different nominal efficiencies as determined by ASHRAE Standard 52.2 and compared these results to the lab-tested and in-situ performance of filters deployed in 21 occupied residential environments. The lab-tested results comparison shows that the dust loading and conditioning procedure in ASHRAE Standard 52.2 provides a reasonable range of efficiencies for the used filters, but the target final pressure drop of 250 Pa is an overestimation of the realistic pressure drops. Moreover, the specified test dust was not a good representation of the dust in this sample of residential environments. The lab-tested and in-situ results comparison suggests that even for the same filter, its lab-tested performance could differ greatly from its in-situ performance because of variations in system and loading conditions, which are not captured in the laboratory setting. Overall, the lab-tested results are an overestimation of the in-situ efficiency and an underestimation of the in-situ pressure drop for both new and used filters.
Laboratory performance of new and used residential HVAC filters: Comparison to field results (RP-1649)
Li, Tianyuan (author) / Siegel, Jeffrey (author)
Science and Technology for the Built Environment ; 26 ; 844-855
2020-07-02
12 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
IAQ and energy implications of high efficiency filters in residential buildings: A review (RP-1649)
| Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2019
A Systemic Short-Term Field Test for Residential HVAC Thermal Comfort Performance
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2006
Field Comparison of Conventional HVAC Systems with a Residential Gas-Engine-Driven Heat Pump
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1994
Field Performance of Residential Refrigerators: A Comparison with the Laboratory Test
| British Library Online Contents | 1993