A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Treatment of 1,3-Butadiene in an Air Stream by a Biotrickling Filter and a Biofilter
This paper presents results obtained from a performance study on the biotreatment of 1,3-butadiene in an air stream using a reactor that consisted of a two-stage, in-series biotrickling filter connected with a three-stage, in-series biofilter. Slags and pig manure-based media were used as packing materials for the biotrickling filter and the biofilter, respectively. Experimental results indicated that, for the biotrickling filter portion, the butadiene elimination capacities were below 5 g/m3/hr for loadings of less than 25 g/m3/hr, and the butadiene removal efficiency was only around 17%. For the biofilter portion, the elimination capacities ranged from 10 to 107 g/m3/hr for loadings of less than 148 g/m3/hr. The average butadiene removal efficiency was 75–84% for superficial gas velocities of 53–142 m/hr and a loading range of 10–120 g/m3/hr. The elimination capacity approached a maximum of 108 g/m3/hr for a loading of 150 g/m3/hr. The elimination rates of butadiene in both the biotrickling filter and biofilter were mass-transfer controlled for influent butadiene concentrations below about 600 ppm for superficial gas velocities of 29–142 m/hr. The elimination capacity was significantly higher in the biofilter than in the biotrickling filter. This discrepancy may be attributed to the higher mass-transfer coefficient and gas-solid interfacial area offered for transferring the gaseous butadiene in the biofilter.
Treatment of 1,3-Butadiene in an Air Stream by a Biotrickling Filter and a Biofilter
This paper presents results obtained from a performance study on the biotreatment of 1,3-butadiene in an air stream using a reactor that consisted of a two-stage, in-series biotrickling filter connected with a three-stage, in-series biofilter. Slags and pig manure-based media were used as packing materials for the biotrickling filter and the biofilter, respectively. Experimental results indicated that, for the biotrickling filter portion, the butadiene elimination capacities were below 5 g/m3/hr for loadings of less than 25 g/m3/hr, and the butadiene removal efficiency was only around 17%. For the biofilter portion, the elimination capacities ranged from 10 to 107 g/m3/hr for loadings of less than 148 g/m3/hr. The average butadiene removal efficiency was 75–84% for superficial gas velocities of 53–142 m/hr and a loading range of 10–120 g/m3/hr. The elimination capacity approached a maximum of 108 g/m3/hr for a loading of 150 g/m3/hr. The elimination rates of butadiene in both the biotrickling filter and biofilter were mass-transfer controlled for influent butadiene concentrations below about 600 ppm for superficial gas velocities of 29–142 m/hr. The elimination capacity was significantly higher in the biofilter than in the biotrickling filter. This discrepancy may be attributed to the higher mass-transfer coefficient and gas-solid interfacial area offered for transferring the gaseous butadiene in the biofilter.
Treatment of 1,3-Butadiene in an Air Stream by a Biotrickling Filter and a Biofilter
Chou, Ming-Shean (author) / Lu, Shu-Ling (author)
Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association ; 48 ; 711-720
1998-08-01
10 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
A Comparative Study of Biofilter and Biotrickling Filter Performance for Isopentane Removal
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1994
A Comparative Study of Biofilter and Biotrickling Filter Performance for Isopentane Removal
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1994
Vinyl chloride removal from an air stream by biotrickling filter
| Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2012
Vinyl chloride removal from an air stream by biotrickling filter
| Online Contents | 2012
Treatment of Ethylether in Air Stream by a Biotrickling Filter Packed with Slags
| Taylor & Francis Verlag | 1999