A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Potential Interference Bias in Ozone Standard Compliance Monitoring
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has established a federal reference method (FRM) for ozone (O3) and allowed for designation of federal equivalent methods (FEMs). However, the ethylene‐chemiluminescence FRM for O3 has been replaced by the UV photometric FEM by most state and local monitoring agencies because of its relative ease of operation. Accumulating evidence indicates that the FEM is prone to bias under the hot, humid, and stagnant conditions conducive to high O3 formation. This bias may lead to overreporting hourly O3 concentrations by as much as 20–40 ppb. Measurement bias is caused by contamination of the O3 scrubber, a problem that is not detected by dry air calibration. An adequate wet test has not been codified, although a procedure has been proposed for agency consideration. This paper includes documentation of laboratory tests quantifying specific interferant responses, collocated ambient FRM/FEM monitoring results, and smog chamber comparisons of the FRM and FEMs with alternative scrubber designs. As the numbers of reports on monitor interferences have grown, interested parties have called for agency recognition and correction of these biases.
Potential Interference Bias in Ozone Standard Compliance Monitoring
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has established a federal reference method (FRM) for ozone (O3) and allowed for designation of federal equivalent methods (FEMs). However, the ethylene‐chemiluminescence FRM for O3 has been replaced by the UV photometric FEM by most state and local monitoring agencies because of its relative ease of operation. Accumulating evidence indicates that the FEM is prone to bias under the hot, humid, and stagnant conditions conducive to high O3 formation. This bias may lead to overreporting hourly O3 concentrations by as much as 20–40 ppb. Measurement bias is caused by contamination of the O3 scrubber, a problem that is not detected by dry air calibration. An adequate wet test has not been codified, although a procedure has been proposed for agency consideration. This paper includes documentation of laboratory tests quantifying specific interferant responses, collocated ambient FRM/FEM monitoring results, and smog chamber comparisons of the FRM and FEMs with alternative scrubber designs. As the numbers of reports on monitor interferences have grown, interested parties have called for agency recognition and correction of these biases.
Potential Interference Bias in Ozone Standard Compliance Monitoring
Leston, Alan R. (author) / Ollison, Will M. (author) / Spicer, Chester W. (author) / Satola, Jan (author)
Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association ; 55 ; 1464-1472
2005-10-01
9 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Overshoot Bias and the National Ozone Standard
Taylor & Francis Verlag | 1999
|British Library Online Contents | 2014
|Wiley | 1988
|Standardized Compliance Monitoring
Wiley | 1991
|Primary Disinfection, Ozone, Utah's First: Compliance and Operational Start-up Issues
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2006
|