A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
At Home at the Neighborhood Square
Using empirical data from a case study of a square in a heterogeneous Rotterdam neighborhood, we address two contradictions in urban social engineering. The first is the aim to make neighborhoods more heterogeneous while fostering a sense of community. The second is making people feel more “at home” in public space by “re-conquering” it from specific groups who should be made to feel less at home. Our data show how people relate to other groups or categories of people on an everyday basis in public space. The square we studied is perceived as a specific territory where some people do not “belong,” while others do. Ethnicity, being an established resident or a relative newcomer, and the mastering of relevant elements of the dominant culture—e.g. speaking the Dutch language—are important elements in feeling at home at the square. Our study reveals that there are limits to bridging social difference and thus making everybody feel at home in public space. This applies to both adults who conceive of difference in terms of hegemony, antagonism, and threat, and to children who are explicitly targeted by policies that we conceptualize as practices of “parenting the city.”
At Home at the Neighborhood Square
Using empirical data from a case study of a square in a heterogeneous Rotterdam neighborhood, we address two contradictions in urban social engineering. The first is the aim to make neighborhoods more heterogeneous while fostering a sense of community. The second is making people feel more “at home” in public space by “re-conquering” it from specific groups who should be made to feel less at home. Our data show how people relate to other groups or categories of people on an everyday basis in public space. The square we studied is perceived as a specific territory where some people do not “belong,” while others do. Ethnicity, being an established resident or a relative newcomer, and the mastering of relevant elements of the dominant culture—e.g. speaking the Dutch language—are important elements in feeling at home at the square. Our study reveals that there are limits to bridging social difference and thus making everybody feel at home in public space. This applies to both adults who conceive of difference in terms of hegemony, antagonism, and threat, and to children who are explicitly targeted by policies that we conceptualize as practices of “parenting the city.”
At Home at the Neighborhood Square
Burgers, Jack (author) / Zuijderwijk, Linda (author)
Home Cultures ; 13 ; 101-121
2016-05-03
21 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Case Study Market Square in San Francisco An edgy neighborhood is now home to tech giant Twitter
British Library Online Contents | 2013
|DO FIRST-TIME HOME BUYERS IMPROVE THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD QUALITY?
Online Contents | 2006
|A simulation model of home improvement with neighborhood spillover
Elsevier | 2016
|Neo-Traditional Neighborhood Developments: You Can Go Home Again
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1994
|