A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Evaluating Plans, Processes and Results
This paper describes the design of an evaluation methodology—the Plan-Process-Results (PPR) approach—and its application to the municipal urban plans currently in force in the two largest Portuguese cities, Lisbon and Oporto. After the identification of the main contributions from a literature review, the fundamental elements of this methodology are characterised. Each case study is appraised according to rationality, performance and conformance, and a number of planning proposals are presented to improve planning practice in each of these cities. Finally, the main similarities and differences between both case studies, as well as the main reasons for these, are identified.
Evaluating Plans, Processes and Results
This paper describes the design of an evaluation methodology—the Plan-Process-Results (PPR) approach—and its application to the municipal urban plans currently in force in the two largest Portuguese cities, Lisbon and Oporto. After the identification of the main contributions from a literature review, the fundamental elements of this methodology are characterised. Each case study is appraised according to rationality, performance and conformance, and a number of planning proposals are presented to improve planning practice in each of these cities. Finally, the main similarities and differences between both case studies, as well as the main reasons for these, are identified.
Evaluating Plans, Processes and Results
Oliveira, Vítor (author) / Pinho, Paulo (author)
Planning Theory & Practice ; 10 ; 35-63
2009-03-01
29 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Evaluating Plans, Processes and Results
| British Library Online Contents | 2009
Evaluating Plans, Processes and Results
| Online Contents | 2009
| Emerald Group Publishing | 2001
| Online Contents | 2001
A framework for qualitatively evaluating management plans in a results-based perspective
| BASE | 2010