A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Discussion on ‘A framework for a civil engineering systems BOK’ by David Carmichael
Carmichael’s paper offers a framework for civil engineering systems work. The approach is rigorous. But equally rigorous should be the principles underlying the work, including a clear and unambiguous defining purpose and a careful attention to modelling principles. That is, a rigorous process is just as important as a rigorous framework. Suggested additions to the proposed framework are: purpose, information (including uncertainty and quality), modelling, topology and value.
Discussion on ‘A framework for a civil engineering systems BOK’ by David Carmichael
Carmichael’s paper offers a framework for civil engineering systems work. The approach is rigorous. But equally rigorous should be the principles underlying the work, including a clear and unambiguous defining purpose and a careful attention to modelling principles. That is, a rigorous process is just as important as a rigorous framework. Suggested additions to the proposed framework are: purpose, information (including uncertainty and quality), modelling, topology and value.
Discussion on ‘A framework for a civil engineering systems BOK’ by David Carmichael
Elms, David (author)
Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems ; 38 ; 273-275
2021-10-02
3 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Response to BOK special issue discussion: ‘BOK and terminology’, by David Carmichael
Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2021
|Risk - a commentary by David G Carmichael
Online Contents | 2017
|Risk – a commentary by David G Carmichael
Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2017
|Author’s reply to: David Elms’ discussion of ‘a framework for a civil engineering BOK’
Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2021
|