A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
State Growth Management Programs and Central-City Revitalization
During the latter part of the 20th century, many U.S. state governments adopted growth management programs for the purpose of establishing a more proactive role in the regulation of land use. Although many scholars have recently begun to critically examine the implementation of these new state initiatives, few have explored their effects on patterns of intraurban land development. In this article, we develop a framework for thinking about the likely effects of state growth management programs on a central city's ability to attract new residential construction activity and investigate this issue using a panel data approach. Multivariate regression results suggest that these programs have observable effects on the spatial distribution of residential construction activity within urban areas. Furthermore, we accept several hypotheses regarding coefficient stability across states, regions, and program designs. These findings suggest that state growth management programs may be an effective tool for promoting the revitalization of central cities.
State Growth Management Programs and Central-City Revitalization
During the latter part of the 20th century, many U.S. state governments adopted growth management programs for the purpose of establishing a more proactive role in the regulation of land use. Although many scholars have recently begun to critically examine the implementation of these new state initiatives, few have explored their effects on patterns of intraurban land development. In this article, we develop a framework for thinking about the likely effects of state growth management programs on a central city's ability to attract new residential construction activity and investigate this issue using a panel data approach. Multivariate regression results suggest that these programs have observable effects on the spatial distribution of residential construction activity within urban areas. Furthermore, we accept several hypotheses regarding coefficient stability across states, regions, and program designs. These findings suggest that state growth management programs may be an effective tool for promoting the revitalization of central cities.
State Growth Management Programs and Central-City Revitalization
Dawkins, Casey J. (author) / Nelson, Arthur C. (author)
Journal of the American Planning Association ; 69 ; 381-396
2003-12-31
16 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
State Growth Management Programs and Central City Revitalization
Online Contents | 2003
|Urban Containment and Central-City Revitalization
Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2004
|Urban Containment and Central-City Revitalization
Online Contents | 2004
|Urban revitalization : policies and programs
TIBKAT | 1995
|Urban Revitalization: Policies and Programs
Online Contents | 1996
|