A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Linguistic landscape (LL) studies have primarily been undertaken by linguists not landscape scholars. By reviewing two works in LL, this review article questions several assumptions of LL and claims the field can be considered a logical extension of any holistic consideration of elements of analysis warranted to be carried out under the banner of traditional sociolinguistics. By questioning what the sub-field of LL offers studies of language in and of landscape, this polemic queries how landscape focused LL actually is and identifies how further LL studies may arise with a more directed landscape emphasis.
Linguistic landscape (LL) studies have primarily been undertaken by linguists not landscape scholars. By reviewing two works in LL, this review article questions several assumptions of LL and claims the field can be considered a logical extension of any holistic consideration of elements of analysis warranted to be carried out under the banner of traditional sociolinguistics. By questioning what the sub-field of LL offers studies of language in and of landscape, this polemic queries how landscape focused LL actually is and identifies how further LL studies may arise with a more directed landscape emphasis.
Is linguistic landscape necessary?
Nash, Joshua (author)
Landscape Research ; 41 ; 380-384
2016-04-02
5 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Is linguistic landscape necessary?
British Library Online Contents | 2016
|Linguistic landscape in the city
TIBKAT | 2010
|Linguistic Landscape and Space: A Multimodal Analysis of Linguistic landscape in Robot Open Space
BASE | 2016
|Linguistic Landscape and Space: A Multimodal Analysis of Linguistic landscape in Robot Open Space
BASE | 2016
|Linguistic landscape in the city
UB Braunschweig | 2010
|