A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Analysis of two-phase ejector performance metrics and comparison of R134a and CO2 ejector performance
Two-phase ejector studies in recent years have shown that the performance of an ejector cycle is strongly dependent on the performance of the ejector. However, measuring the performance of a two-phase ejector is not always straightforward. In the present study, several different metrics that have been proposed for measuring the performance of ejectors are presented and analyzed. Performance metrics originally proposed for single-phase ejectors as well as those proposed specifically for two-phase ejectors are both considered. A simple numerical ejector model is used to simulate ejector operation and calculate the performance of the ejector based on the various performance metrics. The various ejector performance metrics are then compared based on the numerical results. Experimental data from previous studies for R134a and CO2 two-phase ejectors is also presented, and the ejector performance metrics are compared based on the available experimental data as well. It is seen that for a given ejector operating point, the different performance metrics can yield very different values. Based on the data from available ejector studies, it seems that CO2 ejectors can achieve somewhat better performance than R134a ejectors. It is also seen that better ejector performance does not necessarily correlate to better ejector cycle performance.
Analysis of two-phase ejector performance metrics and comparison of R134a and CO2 ejector performance
Two-phase ejector studies in recent years have shown that the performance of an ejector cycle is strongly dependent on the performance of the ejector. However, measuring the performance of a two-phase ejector is not always straightforward. In the present study, several different metrics that have been proposed for measuring the performance of ejectors are presented and analyzed. Performance metrics originally proposed for single-phase ejectors as well as those proposed specifically for two-phase ejectors are both considered. A simple numerical ejector model is used to simulate ejector operation and calculate the performance of the ejector based on the various performance metrics. The various ejector performance metrics are then compared based on the numerical results. Experimental data from previous studies for R134a and CO2 two-phase ejectors is also presented, and the ejector performance metrics are compared based on the available experimental data as well. It is seen that for a given ejector operating point, the different performance metrics can yield very different values. Based on the data from available ejector studies, it seems that CO2 ejectors can achieve somewhat better performance than R134a ejectors. It is also seen that better ejector performance does not necessarily correlate to better ejector cycle performance.
Analysis of two-phase ejector performance metrics and comparison of R134a and CO2 ejector performance
Lawrence, Neal (author) / Elbel, Stefan (author)
Science and Technology for the Built Environment ; 21 ; 515-525
2015-07-04
11 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Numerical study for the design optimization of a two-phase ejector with R134a refrigerant
| British Library Online Contents | 2018
Analysis of Ejector Performance Using 1-D Model
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2013
| British Library Online Contents | 2011