A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Reply to Carmichael on BOK and terminology
The history and philosophy of the growth of engineering knowledge is under-developed – the nearest one can get is the progress of science. That history shows the falsity of Carmichael’s assertion that the absence of an agreed set of meanings for systems terms will hold-back the development of Civil Engineering Systems.
Reply to Carmichael on BOK and terminology
The history and philosophy of the growth of engineering knowledge is under-developed – the nearest one can get is the progress of science. That history shows the falsity of Carmichael’s assertion that the absence of an agreed set of meanings for systems terms will hold-back the development of Civil Engineering Systems.
Reply to Carmichael on BOK and terminology
Blockley, David (author)
Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems ; 38 ; 263-264
2021-10-02
2 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Response to BOK special issue discussion: ‘BOK and terminology’, by David Carmichael
| Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2021
Australia approves Carmichael mine--again
Online Contents | 2015
Queensland Approves Carmichael Lease
Online Contents | 2016
Reply to discussion ‘At one with systems' by D. Carmichael: why systems education is different
| Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2021
Risk - a commentary by David G Carmichael
| Online Contents | 2017