A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Two dimensional landscape photography and the three dimensional landscape
The paper relies on lengthy observation by the author of his own and others’ reaction to three‐dimensionality in landscape. It compares how we see depth in airphotos and on the ground and points out the heightened excitement and response in 3D photos. The paper advances the idea that the spatial arrangement of a landscape is the overriding determinant in our reaction to real landscapes, yet is lost in photographs. Motion parallax and its relationship to our experience of diverse landscape types is discussed.
Two dimensional landscape photography and the three dimensional landscape
The paper relies on lengthy observation by the author of his own and others’ reaction to three‐dimensionality in landscape. It compares how we see depth in airphotos and on the ground and points out the heightened excitement and response in 3D photos. The paper advances the idea that the spatial arrangement of a landscape is the overriding determinant in our reaction to real landscapes, yet is lost in photographs. Motion parallax and its relationship to our experience of diverse landscape types is discussed.
Two dimensional landscape photography and the three dimensional landscape
Young, R N (author)
Landscape Research ; 17 ; 38-46
1992-03-01
9 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
LANDSCAPE - Anne Bousema's photography
Online Contents | 1999
Taylor & Francis Verlag | 1992
|