A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
The Bunshaft Tapes: A Preliminary Report
Among the material collected in the Gordon Bunshaft Papers in the Avery Architectural and Fine Arts Library Archives at Columbia University are seventeen audiocassette tapes documenting a series of interviews between Arthur Drexler (1925-1987), curator of architecture and design at the Museum of Modern Art, and Gordon Bunshaft (1909-1990) of Skidmore, Owings & Merrill (SOM). In these tapes, Bunshaft and Drexler proceed systematically through Bunshaft's work for SOM, with Drexler consistently probing for evidence of authorial intentionality, resisted by Bunshaft. This report considers the manner in which these tapes construct a complex “orality,” in which Bunshaft's testimony refuses the intertextual mediation implied by Drexler's questions, which themselves rely on the authority of an oral testimony to guarantee the authenticity of the answers. In turn, Bunshaft's refusals to engage with architectural discourse in the name of a pseudotransparent pragmatics demonstrate the extent of his identification with the ethos of his clients, corporate executives whose “visionary” status in the postwar period was a function of their own-discursive-privileging of pragmatic action over reflective discourse.
The Bunshaft Tapes: A Preliminary Report
Among the material collected in the Gordon Bunshaft Papers in the Avery Architectural and Fine Arts Library Archives at Columbia University are seventeen audiocassette tapes documenting a series of interviews between Arthur Drexler (1925-1987), curator of architecture and design at the Museum of Modern Art, and Gordon Bunshaft (1909-1990) of Skidmore, Owings & Merrill (SOM). In these tapes, Bunshaft and Drexler proceed systematically through Bunshaft's work for SOM, with Drexler consistently probing for evidence of authorial intentionality, resisted by Bunshaft. This report considers the manner in which these tapes construct a complex “orality,” in which Bunshaft's testimony refuses the intertextual mediation implied by Drexler's questions, which themselves rely on the authority of an oral testimony to guarantee the authenticity of the answers. In turn, Bunshaft's refusals to engage with architectural discourse in the name of a pseudotransparent pragmatics demonstrate the extent of his identification with the ethos of his clients, corporate executives whose “visionary” status in the postwar period was a function of their own-discursive-privileging of pragmatic action over reflective discourse.
The Bunshaft Tapes: A Preliminary Report
Martin, Reinhold (author)
Journal of Architectural Education ; 54 ; 80-87
2000-11-01
8 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
The Bunshaft Tapes: A Preliminary Report
| British Library Online Contents | 2000
Gordon Bunshaft of Skidmore, Owings & Merrill
| TIBKAT | 1988
Gordon Bunshaft and SOM : building corporate modernism
| TIBKAT | 2019
The Bunshaft Tapes: A Preliminary Report
| Online Contents | 2000
| British Library Online Contents | 2004