A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
The Australian landscape is sometimes discussed as the stage or setting on which the events of Australian history have unfolded, but this is a misleading metaphor; first, because It implies a passive role for the ‘stage’ and, second, because it assumes that the landscape was simply ‘there’ waiting. However it was not like that at all, and the second assumption is a biophysical version of the doctrine of terra nullius, that the land was not owned — it was available, passively receptive and, in a sense, already ‘known’. The application of English words is itself a form of appropriation; it implies that rivers are rivers, plains are plains, forests are forests. Though they are not: Australian rivers, plains and forests, are nothing like the things to which these words are applied in Britain. Think of Salisbury Plain and the Nullarbor Plain, which stretches across a third of the continent along the southern margin; or the Thames and the Darling, nearly a 1000 km long, but often no more than a string of water holes. Australians also tend to impose their current knowledge of the landscape on the Europeans who were encountering it for the first time. For example, the school texts show the routes of the explorers on the maps of an explored land, but for the explorers themselves, the map stopped where they pitched camp each night, as Paul Carter reminds us in The Road to Botany Bay.1
The Australian landscape is sometimes discussed as the stage or setting on which the events of Australian history have unfolded, but this is a misleading metaphor; first, because It implies a passive role for the ‘stage’ and, second, because it assumes that the landscape was simply ‘there’ waiting. However it was not like that at all, and the second assumption is a biophysical version of the doctrine of terra nullius, that the land was not owned — it was available, passively receptive and, in a sense, already ‘known’. The application of English words is itself a form of appropriation; it implies that rivers are rivers, plains are plains, forests are forests. Though they are not: Australian rivers, plains and forests, are nothing like the things to which these words are applied in Britain. Think of Salisbury Plain and the Nullarbor Plain, which stretches across a third of the continent along the southern margin; or the Thames and the Darling, nearly a 1000 km long, but often no more than a string of water holes. Australians also tend to impose their current knowledge of the landscape on the Europeans who were encountering it for the first time. For example, the school texts show the routes of the explorers on the maps of an explored land, but for the explorers themselves, the map stopped where they pitched camp each night, as Paul Carter reminds us in The Road to Botany Bay.1
The landscapes of Australia
Seddon, George (author)
2001-03-01
10 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
| Online Contents | 2001
| Online Contents | 2001
| British Library Online Contents | 2001
Australia: Heritage Landscapes and Gardens
| DataCite | 2015
The gendered dimensions of bushfire in changing rural landscapes in Australia
| Online Contents | 2010