A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
From Leipzig to Leipzig
For more than ten years now, EU Member States and the European Commission have been cooperating to agree on joint views and strategies for a European Spatial Development Policy. Based on the “Leipzig Principles”, adopted in Leipzig in 1994, it is now planned to agree on a Territorial Agenda, at the next ministerial meeting in Leipzig, May 2007. In this article, we will analyze the road “from Leipzig to Leipzig”. We will focus on the interplay between policy and science, or evidence, which together form the results in this process. A major result of our investigations is that “institutionalization matters”. We can see a clear trend to a stronger institutionalized base on the research side, from loose networks of national institutes to a newly created institution, ESPON, which was formed as a network with its own managing structure. The development in the policy arena is more ambivalent. After the adoption of the ESDP in 1999, its institutional base that took care of intergovernmental spatial policies at the European level was dismantled, and the present structure to prepare the Territorial Agenda is much weaker. On the other hand, the EU Constitution proposes a stronger legal and institutional base for “territorial cohesion” policies, but, as is well known, the ratification process has been stalled. Actually, the interplay of policy and evidence is situated in an ambiguous setting of diverse processes of institutionalization and de-institutionalization.
From Leipzig to Leipzig
For more than ten years now, EU Member States and the European Commission have been cooperating to agree on joint views and strategies for a European Spatial Development Policy. Based on the “Leipzig Principles”, adopted in Leipzig in 1994, it is now planned to agree on a Territorial Agenda, at the next ministerial meeting in Leipzig, May 2007. In this article, we will analyze the road “from Leipzig to Leipzig”. We will focus on the interplay between policy and science, or evidence, which together form the results in this process. A major result of our investigations is that “institutionalization matters”. We can see a clear trend to a stronger institutionalized base on the research side, from loose networks of national institutes to a newly created institution, ESPON, which was formed as a network with its own managing structure. The development in the policy arena is more ambivalent. After the adoption of the ESDP in 1999, its institutional base that took care of intergovernmental spatial policies at the European level was dismantled, and the present structure to prepare the Territorial Agenda is much weaker. On the other hand, the EU Constitution proposes a stronger legal and institutional base for “territorial cohesion” policies, but, as is well known, the ratification process has been stalled. Actually, the interplay of policy and evidence is situated in an ambiguous setting of diverse processes of institutionalization and de-institutionalization.
From Leipzig to Leipzig
Dr.Böhme, Kai (author) / Schön, Peter (author)
disP - The Planning Review ; 42 ; 61-70
2006-01-01
10 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Leipzig Stadtumbau Leipzig-Ost
British Library Online Contents | 2002
| TIBKAT | 1927
Unterwelt Leipzig - Fotos: Bertram Kober, Leipzig
Online Contents | 1996
| Online Contents | 2011
| TIBKAT | 1990