A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Three: Seattle Freeway Park, Seattle, Washington
The precedent-setting Seattle Freeway Park is a site almost as contested as Skyline Park; but Freeway Park has, in contrast, been updated throughout its history, so future interventions will hopefully not be as immediate or nearly as destructive. As is evident by the situation in Denver, identifying and publicising the significance of these sites and the consequences of their irreversible alteration or removal, should be made a priority well before their fates are called into question. It has become increasingly clear that Freeway Park needs to be addressed before it is lost by neglect, deterioration and abandonment. Currently, the site is additionally threatened by insensitive reco"mmendations presented in a Project for Public Spaces (PPS) report that proposes stripping the site of its exciting concepts by reworking it into a generic form reflective of the trends of our age. Though the site needs a rehabilitation plan that is more aggressive than the one recommended for Heritage Park, strict preservation guidelines must be imposed to prevent irresponsible alterations such as some of those recommended by the PPS report. The nomination to landmark Freeway Park should be accepted and the Seattle Landmarks Preservation Board should monitor the introduction of some of the necessary changes proposed here.
Three: Seattle Freeway Park, Seattle, Washington
The precedent-setting Seattle Freeway Park is a site almost as contested as Skyline Park; but Freeway Park has, in contrast, been updated throughout its history, so future interventions will hopefully not be as immediate or nearly as destructive. As is evident by the situation in Denver, identifying and publicising the significance of these sites and the consequences of their irreversible alteration or removal, should be made a priority well before their fates are called into question. It has become increasingly clear that Freeway Park needs to be addressed before it is lost by neglect, deterioration and abandonment. Currently, the site is additionally threatened by insensitive reco"mmendations presented in a Project for Public Spaces (PPS) report that proposes stripping the site of its exciting concepts by reworking it into a generic form reflective of the trends of our age. Though the site needs a rehabilitation plan that is more aggressive than the one recommended for Heritage Park, strict preservation guidelines must be imposed to prevent irresponsible alterations such as some of those recommended by the PPS report. The nomination to landmark Freeway Park should be accepted and the Seattle Landmarks Preservation Board should monitor the introduction of some of the necessary changes proposed here.
Three: Seattle Freeway Park, Seattle, Washington
2006-01-01
31 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
THREE: SEATTLE FREEWAY PARK, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON
Online Contents | 2006
Seattle Freeway Park, Seattle, Washington
British Library Online Contents | 2006
Seattle Commons, Seattle, Washington
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2002
|