A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Understanding Australia’s Antagonistic Politics of Transport
Having observed a litany of transport projects afflicted by community opposition in recent years, Australian scholars are increasingly recognising the contested nature of transport policy. Many have struggled for a satisfying explanation for these contests – how they work; what determines their outcomes. I argue progress in understanding these conflicts requires that we abandon a key theory in contemporary transport policy scholarship: path dependence. Here I put forward an alternative approach that places contestation right the core of our approach to transport politics. I illustrate its potential to explain policy continuity and reversal by way of two Melbournian case-studies.
Understanding Australia’s Antagonistic Politics of Transport
Having observed a litany of transport projects afflicted by community opposition in recent years, Australian scholars are increasingly recognising the contested nature of transport policy. Many have struggled for a satisfying explanation for these contests – how they work; what determines their outcomes. I argue progress in understanding these conflicts requires that we abandon a key theory in contemporary transport policy scholarship: path dependence. Here I put forward an alternative approach that places contestation right the core of our approach to transport politics. I illustrate its potential to explain policy continuity and reversal by way of two Melbournian case-studies.
Understanding Australia’s Antagonistic Politics of Transport
Murphy, James C. (author)
Urban Policy and Research ; 40 ; 93-103
2022-04-03
11 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Australia's Welfare Wars Revisited: The Players, the Politics and the Ideologies
Oxford University Press | 2009
|Engineering Index Backfile | 1967
Engineering Index Backfile | 1958
|British Library Online Contents | 2007
|Online Contents | 2016
|