A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Effect of upflow and downflow baffle configuration on particulate matter removal in a mirror-symmetrical multi-compartment scrubber
Control over particulate matter (PM) emission from grilling is required for improving public health and air quality. The performance of mirror-symmetrical multi-compartment scrubbers with an upflow (U-type) and downflow baffle (D-type) configuration was evaluated for PM emission control from grilling at a flow rate of 30 m3 min−1. The PM removal efficiency of the U-type scrubber was the highest when the water level was 8 cm (95.6%), and the pressure drops recorded at the water levels of 6, 8 and 10 cm were 103, 122 and 153 mmH2O, respectively. Although PM removal efficiency of the D-type scrubber was over 91.0% at the water levels of 8, 10 and 12 cm, the pressure drops were 124, 142 and 185 mmH2O, respectively. A comprehensive evaluation of the water volume, pressure drop and PM removal performance, as well as device size, revealed that the U-type scrubber with a PM removal efficiency of 92% or higher and a pressure drop of 122 mmH2O or lower at the water levels of 6–8 cm was more economical for removing PM from grilling gas than the D-type scrubber.
Effect of upflow and downflow baffle configuration on particulate matter removal in a mirror-symmetrical multi-compartment scrubber
Control over particulate matter (PM) emission from grilling is required for improving public health and air quality. The performance of mirror-symmetrical multi-compartment scrubbers with an upflow (U-type) and downflow baffle (D-type) configuration was evaluated for PM emission control from grilling at a flow rate of 30 m3 min−1. The PM removal efficiency of the U-type scrubber was the highest when the water level was 8 cm (95.6%), and the pressure drops recorded at the water levels of 6, 8 and 10 cm were 103, 122 and 153 mmH2O, respectively. Although PM removal efficiency of the D-type scrubber was over 91.0% at the water levels of 8, 10 and 12 cm, the pressure drops were 124, 142 and 185 mmH2O, respectively. A comprehensive evaluation of the water volume, pressure drop and PM removal performance, as well as device size, revealed that the U-type scrubber with a PM removal efficiency of 92% or higher and a pressure drop of 122 mmH2O or lower at the water levels of 6–8 cm was more economical for removing PM from grilling gas than the D-type scrubber.
Effect of upflow and downflow baffle configuration on particulate matter removal in a mirror-symmetrical multi-compartment scrubber
Cho, Kyung-Suk (author) / Kang, Soo-Kyung (author) / Lee, Yun-Yeong (author) / Lee, Soo Yeon (author) / Lee, Insook (author)
Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A ; 56 ; 902-911
2021-07-03
10 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Stormwater Polishing: Upflow vs. Downflow Filters
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2007
Upflow and downflow BAFs: Which provides the best overall performance?
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1995
air management device for particulate matter scrubber and sterilization
| European Patent Office | 2022
Removal of particulate matter from pork belly grilling gas using an orifice wet scrubber
| Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2020
Understanding baffle overloads observed in high-mirror configuration on Wendelstein 7-X
| BASE | 2020