A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Application of vadose zone transport models has been hampered by lack of model validation. Difficulties to validate vadose zone models using field data not only come from model assumptions that are uncertain to the subsurface transport processes but also from the uncertainties associated with soil contaminants’ release time and quantity, soil sampling, sample transport, and analytical procedures. This article first conducts a test of a popularly used vadose zone transport VLEACH by comparing model results with a set of laboratory soil column infiltration and volatilization study data. The comparison shows a close agreement between the VLEACH model results and the laboratory data. Second, the sorption coefficient Kd calculated in VLEACH is compared with field data. The comparison indicates that VLEACH may overestimate the mass leached from soil to groundwater. The article also discusses the selection of the model simulation timestep, the vertical dimension increment, the Courant criterion, and the lower boundary condition using the sensitivity analysis method based on a case study of soil remediation for trichloroethylene. The procedures presented in this paper are important to practical model application and modification. This level of work should be routinely conducted for any new or modified version of vadose zone models.
Application of vadose zone transport models has been hampered by lack of model validation. Difficulties to validate vadose zone models using field data not only come from model assumptions that are uncertain to the subsurface transport processes but also from the uncertainties associated with soil contaminants’ release time and quantity, soil sampling, sample transport, and analytical procedures. This article first conducts a test of a popularly used vadose zone transport VLEACH by comparing model results with a set of laboratory soil column infiltration and volatilization study data. The comparison shows a close agreement between the VLEACH model results and the laboratory data. Second, the sorption coefficient Kd calculated in VLEACH is compared with field data. The comparison indicates that VLEACH may overestimate the mass leached from soil to groundwater. The article also discusses the selection of the model simulation timestep, the vertical dimension increment, the Courant criterion, and the lower boundary condition using the sensitivity analysis method based on a case study of soil remediation for trichloroethylene. The procedures presented in this paper are important to practical model application and modification. This level of work should be routinely conducted for any new or modified version of vadose zone models.
A Study of Vadose Zone Transport Model VLEACH
Rong, Yue (author)
Journal of Soil Contamination ; 8 ; 217-229
1999-03-01
13 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Application of Vadose Zone Flow and Transport Models
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1993
Vadose Zone Permeability Tests: Summary
| ASCE | 2021
Vadose Zone Flow and Transport in Cracked Heavy Textured Soil
| British Library Online Contents | 1999
Applying a Vadose Zone Model to Stormwater Infiltration
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2006