A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Multi-Level (Territorial) Governance: Three Criticisms
Multi-level territorial governance has entered European planning discourse, but is the term “territorial” actually redundant? After all, multi-level governance is already thought to refer to the interaction between nested territorial administrations. So could multi-level governance be criticised for giving more attention to the roles and positions of lower-levels in a multi-level polity rather than invoking a comprehensive concept of governance implicating non-governmental actors in policy making? And does the multi-level governance literature ignore the underlying metageography? Whether territories are accordingly fixed jurisdictions or malleable social constructs has implications for planning and beyond.
Multi-Level (Territorial) Governance: Three Criticisms
Multi-level territorial governance has entered European planning discourse, but is the term “territorial” actually redundant? After all, multi-level governance is already thought to refer to the interaction between nested territorial administrations. So could multi-level governance be criticised for giving more attention to the roles and positions of lower-levels in a multi-level polity rather than invoking a comprehensive concept of governance implicating non-governmental actors in policy making? And does the multi-level governance literature ignore the underlying metageography? Whether territories are accordingly fixed jurisdictions or malleable social constructs has implications for planning and beyond.
Multi-Level (Territorial) Governance: Three Criticisms
Faludi, Andreas (author)
Planning Theory & Practice ; 13 ; 197-211
2012-06-01
15 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Multi-Level (Territorial) Governance: Three Criticisms
| Online Contents | 2012
Multi-Level (Territorial) Governance: Three Criticisms
| British Library Online Contents | 2012