A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Air–water flow in a plain stilling basin below smooth and stepped chutes
In recent decades, stepped chutes followed by a stilling basin became a standard for spillways of dams. The comprehensive knowledge of stepped chute approach flows on internal air–water flow properties of the hydraulic jump is still too limited for an appropriate design of stilling basins. Therefore, an experimental campaign was performed on a large-scale physical model of a plain stilling basin preceded by a 30° sloping smooth or stepped chute. Stepped chute approach flows induce lower deaeration rates along the jump roller as compared to smooth chute approach flows, indicating longer dimensionless jump lengths, normalized by the tailwater depth. Pronounced bottom air concentrations were observed within the first 40% of the jump length in the stilling basin downstream of the stepped chute. Thus, despite the significantly higher pressure fluctuations, this zone seems better protected against cavitation damage than in stilling basins following a smooth chute.
Air–water flow in a plain stilling basin below smooth and stepped chutes
In recent decades, stepped chutes followed by a stilling basin became a standard for spillways of dams. The comprehensive knowledge of stepped chute approach flows on internal air–water flow properties of the hydraulic jump is still too limited for an appropriate design of stilling basins. Therefore, an experimental campaign was performed on a large-scale physical model of a plain stilling basin preceded by a 30° sloping smooth or stepped chute. Stepped chute approach flows induce lower deaeration rates along the jump roller as compared to smooth chute approach flows, indicating longer dimensionless jump lengths, normalized by the tailwater depth. Pronounced bottom air concentrations were observed within the first 40% of the jump length in the stilling basin downstream of the stepped chute. Thus, despite the significantly higher pressure fluctuations, this zone seems better protected against cavitation damage than in stilling basins following a smooth chute.
Air–water flow in a plain stilling basin below smooth and stepped chutes
Stojnic, Ivan (author) / Pfister, Michael (author) / Matos, Jorge (author) / Schleiss, Anton J. (author)
Journal of Hydraulic Research ; 61 ; 51-66
2023-01-02
16 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Plain Stilling Basin Performance below 30° and 50° Inclined Smooth and Stepped Chutes
| DOAJ | 2022
Stilling the Waters: Stilling Basin Design for Stepped Chutes
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2015
Stilling Basin Design for Stepped Chutes: More than one type to consider
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2017
PRESSURE HEAD ALONG BAFFLE STILLING BASINS DOWNSTREAM OF STEEPLY SLOPING STEPPED CHUTES
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2007