A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Method variables affecting the bioaccessibility of arsenic in soil
Arsenic bioaccessibility tests are now being commonly used in risk assessment. However, concerns remain about the reliability of such tests because the bioaccessibility of arsenic from soil may be susceptible to soil composition (including iron concentration), as well as method considerations such as varying liquid-to-solid ratios and the chosen buffer system. In this study, arsenic-contaminated tailings and soils were tested to compare two bioaccessibility methods: one that uses glycine as a buffer, and a second that is more physiologically based. With the glycine-buffered method, arsenic and iron bioaccessibility increased in the presence of a higher buffer concentration at higher liquid-to-solid ratios, whereas the results of physiologically-based tests were unaffected by variations in these parameters. In the glycine-buffered system, interactions between iron and glycine may influence the concentration of arsenic in solution, which may not be consistent with human gastrointestinal conditions. The choice of a physiologically-based method may be more appropriate to achieve representative arsenic bioaccessibility values toward estimating risks to human health.
Method variables affecting the bioaccessibility of arsenic in soil
Arsenic bioaccessibility tests are now being commonly used in risk assessment. However, concerns remain about the reliability of such tests because the bioaccessibility of arsenic from soil may be susceptible to soil composition (including iron concentration), as well as method considerations such as varying liquid-to-solid ratios and the chosen buffer system. In this study, arsenic-contaminated tailings and soils were tested to compare two bioaccessibility methods: one that uses glycine as a buffer, and a second that is more physiologically based. With the glycine-buffered method, arsenic and iron bioaccessibility increased in the presence of a higher buffer concentration at higher liquid-to-solid ratios, whereas the results of physiologically-based tests were unaffected by variations in these parameters. In the glycine-buffered system, interactions between iron and glycine may influence the concentration of arsenic in solution, which may not be consistent with human gastrointestinal conditions. The choice of a physiologically-based method may be more appropriate to achieve representative arsenic bioaccessibility values toward estimating risks to human health.
Method variables affecting the bioaccessibility of arsenic in soil
Meunier, Louise (author) / Wragg, Joanna (author) / Koch, Iris (author) / Reimer, Kenneth J. (author)
Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A ; 45 ; 517-526
2010-04-01
10 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Method variables affecting the bioaccessibility of arsenic in soil
Online Contents | 2010
|Properties and bioaccessibility of arsenic sulphide nanosuspensions
British Library Online Contents | 2013
|Linking selective chemical extraction of iron oxyhydroxides to arsenic bioaccessibility in soil
Online Contents | 2015
|Effect of Soil Washing Using Oxalic Acid on Arsenic Speciation and Bioaccessibility in Soils
DOAJ | 2020
|Decreasing arsenic bioaccessibility-bioavailability in soils with iron amendments
Online Contents | 2007
|