A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Comparison between cement and fly ash geopolymer for stabilized marginal lateritic soil as road material
The stabilisation of marginal lateritic soil using cement and fly ash (FA) geopolymer with a liquid alkaline activator was investigated. In this study, soil with satisfactory gradation and percentage of wear was selected. Only the soaked California Bearing Ratio (CBR) value must be enhanced to satisfy the requirement to form a suitable pavement subbase material. Field CBR tests were conducted for both geopolymer- and cement-stabilised soils used as pavement subbase materials. The soaked CBR of cement- and FA-geopolymer-stabilised marginal lateritic soil of various mixing percentages at 14 days satisfied the standard requirements specified by the government agencies in Thailand. Equations were established from field test data to predict the CBR at any testing time. The CBR development of cement-stabilised soil took more time than that of geopolymer-stabilised soil. The appropriate mixing percentages of cement and FA geopolymer with marginal lateritic soil were 3–5 and 4–8%, respectively. Microstructural analysis indicated that the stabilised soil exhibited a denser structure, which corresponded to the CBR increment. The findings of this study will enable the implementation of cement and FA geopolymer as successful stabilisers for pavement subbase materials.
Comparison between cement and fly ash geopolymer for stabilized marginal lateritic soil as road material
The stabilisation of marginal lateritic soil using cement and fly ash (FA) geopolymer with a liquid alkaline activator was investigated. In this study, soil with satisfactory gradation and percentage of wear was selected. Only the soaked California Bearing Ratio (CBR) value must be enhanced to satisfy the requirement to form a suitable pavement subbase material. Field CBR tests were conducted for both geopolymer- and cement-stabilised soils used as pavement subbase materials. The soaked CBR of cement- and FA-geopolymer-stabilised marginal lateritic soil of various mixing percentages at 14 days satisfied the standard requirements specified by the government agencies in Thailand. Equations were established from field test data to predict the CBR at any testing time. The CBR development of cement-stabilised soil took more time than that of geopolymer-stabilised soil. The appropriate mixing percentages of cement and FA geopolymer with marginal lateritic soil were 3–5 and 4–8%, respectively. Microstructural analysis indicated that the stabilised soil exhibited a denser structure, which corresponded to the CBR increment. The findings of this study will enable the implementation of cement and FA geopolymer as successful stabilisers for pavement subbase materials.
Comparison between cement and fly ash geopolymer for stabilized marginal lateritic soil as road material
Teerawattanasuk, Chairat (author) / Voottipruex, Panich (author)
International Journal of Pavement Engineering ; 20 ; 1264-1274
2019-11-02
11 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Stabilisation of marginal lateritic soil using high calcium fly ash-based geopolymer
| Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2016
Stabilisation of marginal lateritic soil using high calcium fly ash-based geopolymer
| British Library Online Contents | 2016