A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Planning appeals: The impacts of conflicting planning philosophies between judicial and executive planning bodies ‐ a rural planning case study
All Australian planning systems include a right of appeal to allow decisions to be reviewed, and the appeal body is usually a court or tribunal. The legal interpretation of planning principles therefore has the capacity to significantly influence planning practice. This article explores the potential for conflicting philosophies between judicial and executive planning bodies and examines the impacts these differences may have on planning practice, policy and outcomes.
Planning appeals: The impacts of conflicting planning philosophies between judicial and executive planning bodies ‐ a rural planning case study
All Australian planning systems include a right of appeal to allow decisions to be reviewed, and the appeal body is usually a court or tribunal. The legal interpretation of planning principles therefore has the capacity to significantly influence planning practice. This article explores the potential for conflicting philosophies between judicial and executive planning bodies and examines the impacts these differences may have on planning practice, policy and outcomes.
Planning appeals: The impacts of conflicting planning philosophies between judicial and executive planning bodies ‐ a rural planning case study
Willey, Stephen (author)
Urban Policy and Research ; 18 ; 329-354
2000-01-01
26 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Online Contents | 1995
Online Contents | 1994
Planning Applications and Appeals
| Online Contents | 1998
Planning control : philosophies, prospects and practice
| TIBKAT | 1987
PLANNING IN A CONFLICTING MILIEU. A CASE STUDY
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1996