A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A comparison of hydration properties of cement–low quality fly ash binder and cement–limestone powder binder
The hydration properties of the binder containing low quality fly ash or limestone powder were compared in this study. Isothermal calorimetry was performed to measure the hydration heat of the binders during the first 3 days. Mercury intrusion porosimetry, scanning electron microscope, and thermogravimetry–differential thermal analysis were all used to determine the pore structure and hydration products of paste. The compressive strength of the pastes of age 3, 7, 28, and 90 days was also tested. The results indicate that the ground low quality fly ash can improve the mechanical properties of composite cementitious material and ameliorate the hydration properties and microstructure compared with the inert admixture limestone powder. The chemical activity of low quality fly ash presents gradually and appears high pozzolanic effect at later period, and it can accelerate the generation of hydration products containing more chemically bonded water. This leads to the higher rate of strength growth and cement hydration degree, the more compact microstructure and reasonable pore size distribution. Additionally, low quality fly ash delays the induction period, but shortens the acceleration period, therefore there is no significant influence on the second exothermic peak occurrence time.
A comparison of hydration properties of cement–low quality fly ash binder and cement–limestone powder binder
The hydration properties of the binder containing low quality fly ash or limestone powder were compared in this study. Isothermal calorimetry was performed to measure the hydration heat of the binders during the first 3 days. Mercury intrusion porosimetry, scanning electron microscope, and thermogravimetry–differential thermal analysis were all used to determine the pore structure and hydration products of paste. The compressive strength of the pastes of age 3, 7, 28, and 90 days was also tested. The results indicate that the ground low quality fly ash can improve the mechanical properties of composite cementitious material and ameliorate the hydration properties and microstructure compared with the inert admixture limestone powder. The chemical activity of low quality fly ash presents gradually and appears high pozzolanic effect at later period, and it can accelerate the generation of hydration products containing more chemically bonded water. This leads to the higher rate of strength growth and cement hydration degree, the more compact microstructure and reasonable pore size distribution. Additionally, low quality fly ash delays the induction period, but shortens the acceleration period, therefore there is no significant influence on the second exothermic peak occurrence time.
A comparison of hydration properties of cement–low quality fly ash binder and cement–limestone powder binder
Liu, Shuhua (author) / Kong, Yaning (author) / Wang, Lu (author)
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry ; 116 ; 937-943
2014
7 Seiten
Article (Journal)
English