A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Investigating the flexural resistance of fiber reinforced cementitious composites under biaxial condition
The flexural resistance of fiber reinforced cementitious composites (FRCCs) under biaxial condition was investigated by using two different types of biaxial bending test methods: the biaxial flexural test (BFT) and the centrally loaded round panel test (RPT). The flexural responses of FRCCs under biaxial condition were then compared with those of FRCCs under uniaxial condition; i.e. four-points bending test (4PBT). The test results, including the equivalent biaxial strength and normalized energy absorption capacity of the RPT, were found to be clearly higher than those of the BFT, and completely different cracking behavior was observed between the two biaxial test methods; the BFT generated numerous randomly distributed micro-cracks at the bottom of specimens, whereas the RPT mostly showed three major cracks, with minor radial cracks around them. In addition, the equivalent flexural tensile strength and normalized energy absorption capacity of the FRCCs under biaxial condition were found to be higher than those under uniaxial condition. The energy absorption capacity and the ratio of flexural tensile strength to the direct tensile strength of FRCCs are dependent on the stress state.
Investigating the flexural resistance of fiber reinforced cementitious composites under biaxial condition
The flexural resistance of fiber reinforced cementitious composites (FRCCs) under biaxial condition was investigated by using two different types of biaxial bending test methods: the biaxial flexural test (BFT) and the centrally loaded round panel test (RPT). The flexural responses of FRCCs under biaxial condition were then compared with those of FRCCs under uniaxial condition; i.e. four-points bending test (4PBT). The test results, including the equivalent biaxial strength and normalized energy absorption capacity of the RPT, were found to be clearly higher than those of the BFT, and completely different cracking behavior was observed between the two biaxial test methods; the BFT generated numerous randomly distributed micro-cracks at the bottom of specimens, whereas the RPT mostly showed three major cracks, with minor radial cracks around them. In addition, the equivalent flexural tensile strength and normalized energy absorption capacity of the FRCCs under biaxial condition were found to be higher than those under uniaxial condition. The energy absorption capacity and the ratio of flexural tensile strength to the direct tensile strength of FRCCs are dependent on the stress state.
Investigating the flexural resistance of fiber reinforced cementitious composites under biaxial condition
Kim, Jihwan (author) / Kim, Dong-Joo (author) / Park, Seung-Hun (author) / Zi, Goangseup (author)
Composite Structures ; 122 ; 198-208
2015
11 Seiten, 43 Quellen
Article (Journal)
English
Flexural Response of Hybrid Fiber-Reinforced Cementitious Composites
| Online Contents | 2005
Flexural Response of Hybrid Fiber-Reinforced Cementitious Composites
| British Library Online Contents | 2005
Comparative flexural behavior of four fiber reinforced cementitious composites
| Online Contents | 2008
Comparative flexural behavior of four fiber reinforced cementitious composites
| Online Contents | 2008