A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Numerical study on ground improvement for liquefaction mitigation using stone columns encased with geosynthetics
The geosynthetic-encased stone column (ESC) strategy has been extensively used for improving soft soils. However, no studies have been conducted to assess the use of ESCs to mitigate sand strata. In this study, three-dimensional finite element (FE) analyses were conducted to explore the mitigation of mildly sloped saturated sand strata using ESC approaches. We investigated the encasement effect in ESC remediation and the effect of the following important design parameters in reducing lateral ground deformation: the thickness, the tensile stiffness, and the permeability of the geosynthetic; the ESC diameter; and the distributed load at the stone column (SC) surface. The results showed that the ESC remediation reduced more lateral deformation, compared to the SC approach. The ground stiffening was also dramatically enhanced as the stiffness and thickness of the geosynthetic and the ESC diameter were increased, but the encased efficiency gradually decreased. The lateral ground displacement began to decrease significantly when the permeability of the geosynthetic exceeded 0.1 m/s. The larger surface load did not prevent soil liquefaction, but it produced significantly less displacements and virtually no permanent deformation.
Numerical study on ground improvement for liquefaction mitigation using stone columns encased with geosynthetics
The geosynthetic-encased stone column (ESC) strategy has been extensively used for improving soft soils. However, no studies have been conducted to assess the use of ESCs to mitigate sand strata. In this study, three-dimensional finite element (FE) analyses were conducted to explore the mitigation of mildly sloped saturated sand strata using ESC approaches. We investigated the encasement effect in ESC remediation and the effect of the following important design parameters in reducing lateral ground deformation: the thickness, the tensile stiffness, and the permeability of the geosynthetic; the ESC diameter; and the distributed load at the stone column (SC) surface. The results showed that the ESC remediation reduced more lateral deformation, compared to the SC approach. The ground stiffening was also dramatically enhanced as the stiffness and thickness of the geosynthetic and the ESC diameter were increased, but the encased efficiency gradually decreased. The lateral ground displacement began to decrease significantly when the permeability of the geosynthetic exceeded 0.1 m/s. The larger surface load did not prevent soil liquefaction, but it produced significantly less displacements and virtually no permanent deformation.
Numerical study on ground improvement for liquefaction mitigation using stone columns encased with geosynthetics
Tang, Liang (author) / Cong, Shengyi (author) / Ling, Xianzhang (author) / Lu, Jinchi (author) / Elgamal, Ahmed (author)
Geotextiles and Geomembranes ; 43 ; 190-195
2015
6 Seiten, 40 Quellen
Article (Journal)
English
Geosynthetics Encased Stone Columns
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1999
|CENTRIFUGE MODELING OF GEOSYNTHETICS ENCASED STONE COLUMNS
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1998
|Encased Stone Columns for Soft Ground Improvement
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2016
|