A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Creep Rupture vs. Strain-Limited Creep - Analytical and Practical Comparison
Continued deformation under a constant load, also known as creep, is a property of polymer geosynthetics that must be taken into consideration when determining the allowable long-term design strength. The geosynthetic's long-term design strength is used in design for reinforcement applications such as retaining walls, steep slopes and embankments. Currently, two ASTM Standard tests exist to determine the reduction factor due to creep (RFCR), and both tests may yield significantly different results. The older of the two tests, ASTM D5262, also known as the Conventional Test, is considered a strain-limited load test where the RFCR is a function of the maximum creep strain of the geosynthetic over a given period of time, usually the design life of the structure. The second test, ASTM D6992, is a creep rupture test using the Stepped - Isothermal Method (SIM), which provides an accelerated means of defining the creep rupture behavior of polymer geosynthetics. As a first objective, the paper will briefly describe the test methods and point out the differences in the approaches used to define the reduction factor. This will shed some light on the reasons why significantly different values may be obtained. The second objective of the paper is to present typical creep-related specifications, prepared by the engineering community as well as specifying agencies, and demonstrate the impact on the long-term design of the geosynthetic, depending on which approach, creep rupture or strain-limited creep, is used.
Creep Rupture vs. Strain-Limited Creep - Analytical and Practical Comparison
Continued deformation under a constant load, also known as creep, is a property of polymer geosynthetics that must be taken into consideration when determining the allowable long-term design strength. The geosynthetic's long-term design strength is used in design for reinforcement applications such as retaining walls, steep slopes and embankments. Currently, two ASTM Standard tests exist to determine the reduction factor due to creep (RFCR), and both tests may yield significantly different results. The older of the two tests, ASTM D5262, also known as the Conventional Test, is considered a strain-limited load test where the RFCR is a function of the maximum creep strain of the geosynthetic over a given period of time, usually the design life of the structure. The second test, ASTM D6992, is a creep rupture test using the Stepped - Isothermal Method (SIM), which provides an accelerated means of defining the creep rupture behavior of polymer geosynthetics. As a first objective, the paper will briefly describe the test methods and point out the differences in the approaches used to define the reduction factor. This will shed some light on the reasons why significantly different values may be obtained. The second objective of the paper is to present typical creep-related specifications, prepared by the engineering community as well as specifying agencies, and demonstrate the impact on the long-term design of the geosynthetic, depending on which approach, creep rupture or strain-limited creep, is used.
Creep Rupture vs. Strain-Limited Creep - Analytical and Practical Comparison
Bernardi, Michael (author) / Lostumbo, John (author)
Geosynthetics, Geosynthetics Conference, 2015 ; 1174-1178
2015
5 Seiten, Bilder, Tabellen, Quellen
Conference paper
Storage medium
English
Creep and creep-rupture testing
Engineering Index Backfile | 1947
|Predicting creep rupture from early strain data
British Library Online Contents | 2009
|The potential for major extrapolation of creep rupture and creep strain data
British Library Online Contents | 2014
|Fundamentals of creep and creep-rupture in metals
UB Braunschweig | 1965
|Analytical Estimation of the Creep Behaviour of Basalt FRP Bars Below the Creep Rupture Limit
Springer Verlag | 2023
|