A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Some shortcomings in Michell's truss theory
Michell (1904) derived his well-known optimality criteria for trusses in the context of unequal permissible stresses in tension and compression. For the same design constraints, Hemp (1973) and the author (e.g. 1989) have obtained optimality conditions which are different from those of Michell, and also lead, in general, to different, and lighter trusses. The reasons for this contradiction are examined and it is found that for unequal permissible stresses Michell's optimality conditions are only valid for a highly restricted class of support conditions.
Some shortcomings in Michell's truss theory
Michell (1904) derived his well-known optimality criteria for trusses in the context of unequal permissible stresses in tension and compression. For the same design constraints, Hemp (1973) and the author (e.g. 1989) have obtained optimality conditions which are different from those of Michell, and also lead, in general, to different, and lighter trusses. The reasons for this contradiction are examined and it is found that for unequal permissible stresses Michell's optimality conditions are only valid for a highly restricted class of support conditions.
Some shortcomings in Michell's truss theory
Einige Mängel der Fachwerkträger-Theorie von Michell
Rozvany, G.I.N. (author)
Structural Optimization ; 12 ; 244-250
1996
7 Seiten, 5 Bilder, 20 Quellen
Article (Journal)
English
Some transformations of Michell's integral
TIBKAT | 1954
|Michell's Pass in use for 150 years
British Library Online Contents | 1999
|NTIS | 1994
Observations on Some Shortcomings in Foundation Analysis and Design
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2002
|Research shortcomings in housing
Online Contents | 2009
|