A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Differential responses of amphibian and reptile assemblages to size of riparian buffers within managed forests
AbstractStreamside management zones (i.e., riparian buffers;SMZs) are commonly implemented within managed forests to protect water quality but may also provide habitat for riparian‐associated wildlife. Yet, little research has rigorously addressed the value ofSMZs for wildlife, particularly for cryptic species such as amphibians and reptiles. Previous studies of herpetofauna withinSMZs have focused on one or a few stream‐associated species, and questions remain regarding variation among species or guilds and what roleSMZs serve toward conservation of herpetofaunal diversity in managed forests. However, recent statistical advances have improved our ability to analyze large multi‐species presence–absence data sets, accounting for low detection rates typical for some herpetofaunal species. Our study represents an extensive landscape‐scale examination of herpetofaunal communities withinSMZs using a multi‐species occupancy approach. We conducted four replicate surveys at 102 headwater streams, spanning a gradient ofSMZwidths and adjacent forest stand ages, within the Ouachita Mountains, Arkansas,USA. We used a hierarchical Bayesian community occupancy model to estimate species richness and species‐specific occupancy responses toSMZand overstory characteristics, accounting for variation in occupancy and detection attributable to site and sampling covariates. We documented high richness (37 species) withinSMZs. Across the herpetofaunal community, occupancy and species richness were consistently positively associated withSMZwidth, with maximum predicted richness of 30 species occurring at sites with buffers extending 51 m on either side of the stream. However, we documented considerable variation among groups and species within groups, underscoring the potential for different responses to forest management among taxa. Reptile predicted richness increased more rapidly up toSMZs of ~35 m, whereas maximum salamander predicted richness was not seen until anSMZwidth of 55 m. Estimated salamander richness was highest withinSMZs embedded in mature managed pine stands and was higher inSMZs comprised of a deciduous or mixed overstory vs. a pine overstory. Compared to salamanders, more anuran species showed high mean estimated occupancy (>75%) at narrowerSMZs (<30 m). Collectively, our results indicate thatSMZs surrounding small first‐order streams in intensively managed forests not only protect water quality, but also can support diverse amphibian and reptile communities.
Differential responses of amphibian and reptile assemblages to size of riparian buffers within managed forests
AbstractStreamside management zones (i.e., riparian buffers;SMZs) are commonly implemented within managed forests to protect water quality but may also provide habitat for riparian‐associated wildlife. Yet, little research has rigorously addressed the value ofSMZs for wildlife, particularly for cryptic species such as amphibians and reptiles. Previous studies of herpetofauna withinSMZs have focused on one or a few stream‐associated species, and questions remain regarding variation among species or guilds and what roleSMZs serve toward conservation of herpetofaunal diversity in managed forests. However, recent statistical advances have improved our ability to analyze large multi‐species presence–absence data sets, accounting for low detection rates typical for some herpetofaunal species. Our study represents an extensive landscape‐scale examination of herpetofaunal communities withinSMZs using a multi‐species occupancy approach. We conducted four replicate surveys at 102 headwater streams, spanning a gradient ofSMZwidths and adjacent forest stand ages, within the Ouachita Mountains, Arkansas,USA. We used a hierarchical Bayesian community occupancy model to estimate species richness and species‐specific occupancy responses toSMZand overstory characteristics, accounting for variation in occupancy and detection attributable to site and sampling covariates. We documented high richness (37 species) withinSMZs. Across the herpetofaunal community, occupancy and species richness were consistently positively associated withSMZwidth, with maximum predicted richness of 30 species occurring at sites with buffers extending 51 m on either side of the stream. However, we documented considerable variation among groups and species within groups, underscoring the potential for different responses to forest management among taxa. Reptile predicted richness increased more rapidly up toSMZs of ~35 m, whereas maximum salamander predicted richness was not seen until anSMZwidth of 55 m. Estimated salamander richness was highest withinSMZs embedded in mature managed pine stands and was higher inSMZs comprised of a deciduous or mixed overstory vs. a pine overstory. Compared to salamanders, more anuran species showed high mean estimated occupancy (>75%) at narrowerSMZs (<30 m). Collectively, our results indicate thatSMZs surrounding small first‐order streams in intensively managed forests not only protect water quality, but also can support diverse amphibian and reptile communities.
Differential responses of amphibian and reptile assemblages to size of riparian buffers within managed forests
Ecological Applications
Guzy, Jacquelyn C. (author) / Halloran, Kelly M. (author) / Homyack, Jessica A. (author) / Thornton‐Frost, Jamie E. (author) / Willson, John D. (author)
2019-12-01
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Preferences for riparian buffers
| Online Contents | 2009
Urban Riparian Zones: Designing Mitigation Buffers
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2014