AbstractEuropean legislations frequently focus on substances that are of potential concern to human or environmental health, such as “priority substances” under the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC (“WFD”) that are identified as substances posing a significant risk to or via the aquatic environment. The EU REACH regulation also requires the assessment of the environmental risks of chemicals put on the EU market. To properly assess the potential risk of a substance, high‐quality representative monitoring data should be compared with a safe threshold concentration. The objective of this article is to evaluate different publicly available freshwater monitoring data sets for silver and investigate them for a potential European‐wide risk according to the methodology used by the European Commission. Most available silver monitoring data sets contain a large proportion of undetected samples with a reported concentration below the limit of quantification (LOQ) of the analytical technique, leading to considerable uncertainty in the data set. For silver, this LOQ is often at or above the safe threshold concentration, and the method used to handle undetected samples during the data processing considerably impacts the data assessment. We demonstrate that for large data sets covering many European countries (and often a wide range of LOQs), the uncertainty in the data set does not allow us to make a general conclusion about European‐wide risk. However, by examining the data sets in more detail and assessing three additional country‐specific monitoring data sets, we show that silver does not pose a risk to the freshwater environment in several countries. We conclude that the available data sets need careful assessment to account for the values that are below the LOQ, and that there is currently no reliable evidence indicating a European‐wide risk for silver in the aquatic environment, meaning it should not be selected as  priority substance under the WFD. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2023;19:1110–1119. © 2022 European Precious Metals Federation. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).

Key Points There is currently no reliable evidence indicating a European‐wide risk for silver in the aquatic environment, meaning it should not be selected as a priority substance under the Water Framework Directive. The available European freshwater silver monitoring data sets need careful assessment to account for the values that are below the limit of quantification (LOQ). Silver does not pose a risk to the freshwater environment in those countries where a meaningful data assessment is possible because of sufficiently low LOQs (France, Germany, Norway, Poland, and the Netherlands). Speciation modeling of silver at conservative as well as environmentally relevant concentrations of sulfide and dissolved organic carbon shows that silver in freshwater is mainly present in precipitated form, with dissolved Ag concentrations being low (<0.5%).