A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Relocation of Utility Facilities in Maryland Joint Discussion
This article discusses procedures for establishing a continuing liaison between both private and public utilities and the commission in connection with road projects to be built either with state funds or in connection with federal aid projects. The utility relocation liaison procedure consists of seven major phases: planning meeting; preliminary inspection; design plans conference; final design plan; advertising and contract; construction, and billing. An example is presented of the relocation of utility facilities by the Maryland State Roads Commission. The article is followed with a discussion by Robert J. McLeod on the experience the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission (WSSC) had with relocating its facilities due to highway construction, and determining responsibility for payment. McLeod comments on the utility facility relocation liaison procedure and notes that it does not differ significantly from what was then in place between the commission and WSSC.
Relocation of Utility Facilities in Maryland Joint Discussion
This article discusses procedures for establishing a continuing liaison between both private and public utilities and the commission in connection with road projects to be built either with state funds or in connection with federal aid projects. The utility relocation liaison procedure consists of seven major phases: planning meeting; preliminary inspection; design plans conference; final design plan; advertising and contract; construction, and billing. An example is presented of the relocation of utility facilities by the Maryland State Roads Commission. The article is followed with a discussion by Robert J. McLeod on the experience the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission (WSSC) had with relocating its facilities due to highway construction, and determining responsibility for payment. McLeod comments on the utility facility relocation liaison procedure and notes that it does not differ significantly from what was then in place between the commission and WSSC.
Relocation of Utility Facilities in Maryland Joint Discussion
Journal ‐ American Water Works Association ; 54 ; 269-276
1962-03-01
8 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Iron Removal Facilities: Joint Discussion
Wiley | 1966
Utility responsible for relocation costs
Wiley | 1983
NARUC Resolution on Relocation of Facilities
Wiley | 1953
Reduce Urban Tunnel Utility Relocation Risk Through Early Relocation by Specialty Contractor
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2017
|