A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Numerical modeling of sneeze airflow and its validation with an experimental dataset
In this study, we aimed at providing datasets using experimental results to validate the sneeze airflow. In addition, the boundary conditions for the sneeze simulation that could reproduce the sneeze airflow in the experimental results are presented and reviewed. The validation datasets were created by performing ensemble‐average analysis with the experimental results of particle image velocimetry, and these were used to explore the boundary conditions to reproduce the sneeze airflow. As a result of the sneeze airflow reproduced by computational fluid dynamics simulation, the magnitude ranges of maximum velocity at the interface were observed to be 21.1–23.9 m/s for males and 17.9–20.3 m/s for females, which were higher than those of coughing. Compared with the experimental results, the root‐mean‐square error range for the overall airflow distribution was 0.19–0.23 m/s, whereas the error range for the magnitude of the maximum velocity at a criterion point was 0.03–0.08 m/s. The total sneezing airflow volume was in the range of 0.36–0.48 L, which was relatively low compared with that of coughing. Thus, this study provides important fundamental boundary conditions for computational fluid dynamics analysis, validated by experimental results, to interpret the spread of infectious particles by sneezing.
Numerical modeling of sneeze airflow and its validation with an experimental dataset
In this study, we aimed at providing datasets using experimental results to validate the sneeze airflow. In addition, the boundary conditions for the sneeze simulation that could reproduce the sneeze airflow in the experimental results are presented and reviewed. The validation datasets were created by performing ensemble‐average analysis with the experimental results of particle image velocimetry, and these were used to explore the boundary conditions to reproduce the sneeze airflow. As a result of the sneeze airflow reproduced by computational fluid dynamics simulation, the magnitude ranges of maximum velocity at the interface were observed to be 21.1–23.9 m/s for males and 17.9–20.3 m/s for females, which were higher than those of coughing. Compared with the experimental results, the root‐mean‐square error range for the overall airflow distribution was 0.19–0.23 m/s, whereas the error range for the magnitude of the maximum velocity at a criterion point was 0.03–0.08 m/s. The total sneezing airflow volume was in the range of 0.36–0.48 L, which was relatively low compared with that of coughing. Thus, this study provides important fundamental boundary conditions for computational fluid dynamics analysis, validated by experimental results, to interpret the spread of infectious particles by sneezing.
Numerical modeling of sneeze airflow and its validation with an experimental dataset
Oh, Wonseok PhD (author) / Ooka, Ryozo PhD (author) / Kikumoto, Hideki PhD (author) / Han, Mengtao PhD (author)
Indoor Air ; 32
2022-11-01
15 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
British Library Online Contents | 2009