A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Evaluating the performance of a portable water–mist fire extinguishing system with additives
10.1002/fam.967.abs
This study investigates how high‐pressure water–mist system discharge methodologies influence the fire extinction performance for pan pool fires and the corresponding mechanisms of restraining fire. The fire source is a pool‐fire burner. Fine water spray is injected using a portable device. The additive in the water–mist is neither toxic nor corrosive. All the tests are regarded as fuel controlled. The fire test parameters are fuel type, nozzle discharge angle, and additive solution volume. The fuels used are heptane, gasoline, and diesel. Nozzle discharge angles are 30, 45, and 60° with respect to the ground. Additive solution volumes are 0% (pure water), 3, 6, and 10%. Test results indicate that the nozzle discharge angle and additive solution volume in a water–mist fire extinction system play a significant role. Fire extinguishing efficiency is influenced by mist effects and the additive. Furthermore, the water–mist system can reduce radiation and can provide good protection for operators using portable fire extinguishing equipment. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Evaluating the performance of a portable water–mist fire extinguishing system with additives
10.1002/fam.967.abs
This study investigates how high‐pressure water–mist system discharge methodologies influence the fire extinction performance for pan pool fires and the corresponding mechanisms of restraining fire. The fire source is a pool‐fire burner. Fine water spray is injected using a portable device. The additive in the water–mist is neither toxic nor corrosive. All the tests are regarded as fuel controlled. The fire test parameters are fuel type, nozzle discharge angle, and additive solution volume. The fuels used are heptane, gasoline, and diesel. Nozzle discharge angles are 30, 45, and 60° with respect to the ground. Additive solution volumes are 0% (pure water), 3, 6, and 10%. Test results indicate that the nozzle discharge angle and additive solution volume in a water–mist fire extinction system play a significant role. Fire extinguishing efficiency is influenced by mist effects and the additive. Furthermore, the water–mist system can reduce radiation and can provide good protection for operators using portable fire extinguishing equipment. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Evaluating the performance of a portable water–mist fire extinguishing system with additives
Chang, Wen‐Yao (author) / Fu, Ping‐Kun (author) / Chen, Chiun‐Hsun (author) / Shu, Yi‐Liang (author)
Fire and Materials ; 32 ; 383-397
2008-11-01
15 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Evaluating the performance of a portable water-mist fire extinguishing system with additives
| Online Contents | 2008
Evaluating the performance of a portable water-mist fire extinguishing system with additives
| British Library Online Contents | 2008
Performance Evaluation of Portable Water Mist Fire Extinguishing System
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2006
ARTICLES - SoftEx Fire Extinguishing System - Fire-fighting with water mist
Online Contents | 2000
HALON REPLACEMENT: WATER MIST FIRE EXTINGUISHING SYSTEMS
| British Library Online Contents | 2008