A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
US Supreme Court Offers Clean Water Act Plaintiffs Their Day in Court
In Sackett v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [132 S.Ct. 1367 (2012)], decided by the U.S. Supreme Court Mar. 21, 2012, Justice Antonin Scalia introduced plaintiffs Chantell and Michael Sackett as “interested parties feeling their way” around Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction. In this latest opinion addressing the CWA, Scalia presented the quandary facing all who are touched by the regulatory regime of this act.
US Supreme Court Offers Clean Water Act Plaintiffs Their Day in Court
In Sackett v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [132 S.Ct. 1367 (2012)], decided by the U.S. Supreme Court Mar. 21, 2012, Justice Antonin Scalia introduced plaintiffs Chantell and Michael Sackett as “interested parties feeling their way” around Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction. In this latest opinion addressing the CWA, Scalia presented the quandary facing all who are touched by the regulatory regime of this act.
US Supreme Court Offers Clean Water Act Plaintiffs Their Day in Court
Duhy, Tara (author) / Hennessy, Kevin (author)
Journal ‐ American Water Works Association ; 104 ; 17-18
2012-06-01
2 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Wiley | 2011
|British Library Online Contents | 1997
Supreme folly: Supreme Court building, Windhoek, Namibia
British Library Online Contents | 1997
New Supreme Court Takings Victory
British Library Online Contents | 1999
|Colorado Supreme Court Extends Water Court's Jurisdiction
Wiley | 2002
|